Skip to main content

Biological Actuators Are Not Just Springs

Investigating Muscle Dynamics and Control Signals

  • Conference paper
From Animals to Animats 9 (SAB 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4095))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1794 Accesses

Abstract

While there is a trend in current robotics towards more biologically inspired actuators, most work emphasizes the elastic property of muscles and tendons. Although elasticity plays a major role in many forms of movements, particularly walking and running, other features of animal muscles might also affect or even dominate movement dynamics. In this paper we use the Hill-type muscle model, common in biomechanics, to investigate the relationship between muscle dynamics and control signals in simple goal-directed movements. We find that the various non-linearities of the model lead to desirable properties with regard to controllability, such as increased stability and robustness to noise, independence of position and stiffness, or near linearity in search space. We conclude that in our attempt to create robots exhibiting the same flexibility and robustness as animals we have to seek a balance between the complexity of actuators and the extent to which their natural dynamics can be exploited in a given task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bar-Cohen, Y.: Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles - Reality, Potential and Challenges, vol. PM98. SPIE Press, San Jose (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman, A., Ostry, D., et al.: Recent tests of the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model). MotorControl 2, 189–205 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garner, B.A., Pandy, M.G.: Estimation of Musculotendon Properties in the Human Upper Limb. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31(2), 207–220 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gribble, P.L., Ostry, D.J., Sanguineti, V., Laboissiere, R.: Are Complex Control Signals Required for Human Arm Movement? J. Neurophysiology 79, 1409–1424 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, I.E., Loeb, G.E.: A reductionist approach to creating and using neuromusculoskeletal models. In: Winters, J.M., Crago, P.E. (eds.) Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement. Springer, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murray, W.M., Buchanan, T.S., et al.: The isometric functional capacity of muscles that cross the elbow. Journal of Biomechanics 33(8), 943–952 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pfeifer, R., Iida, F.: Morphological computation: Connecting body, brain and environment. Japanese Scientific Monthly 58(2), 48–54 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pfeifer, R.: Building ‘fungus eaters’: Design principles of autonomous agents. In: Maes, P., Mataric, M.J., Meyer, J.A., Pollack, J., Wilson, S.W. (eds.) From Animals to Animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pratt, J.E., Krupp, B.T.: Series Elastic Actuators for Legged Robots. SPIE, San Jose (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Verrelst, B., et al.: The pneumatic biped ‘lucy’ actuated with pleated pneumatic artificial muscles. Autonomous Robots 18, 201–213 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner, H., Blickhan, R.: Stabilizing function of skeletal muscles: an analytical investigation. J. Theor. Biol. 199, 163–179 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zajac, F.E.: Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. CRC Crit. Revs. biomed. Engng. 17, 359–411 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buehrmann, T., Di Paolo, E. (2006). Biological Actuators Are Not Just Springs. In: Nolfi, S., et al. From Animals to Animats 9. SAB 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11840541_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11840541_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38608-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38615-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics