Skip to main content

Decidable Fragments of Logic Programming with Value Invention

  • Conference paper
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4160))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 567 Accesses

Abstract

The issue of value invention in logic programming embraces many scenarios, such as logic programming with function symbols, object oriented logic languages, inter-operability with external sources of knowledge, set unification. This paper introduces a framework embedding value invention in a general context. The class of programs having a suitable (but, in general, not decidable) ‘finite grounding property’ is identified, and the class of ‘value invention restricted’ programs is introduced. Value invention restricted programs have the finite grounding property and can be decided in polynomial time. They are, in a sense, the broadest polynomially decidable class having this property, whenever no assumption can be made about the nature of invented values (while this latter is the case in the specific literature about logic programming with function symbols). Relationships with existing formalisms are eventually discussed; in particular, value invention restricted programs subsume ω-restricted programs and are incomparable with finitary programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Vianu, V.: Datalog Extensions for Database Queries and Updates. JCSS 43(1), 62–124 (1991)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Cabibbo, L.: Expressiveness of Semipositive Logic Programs with Value Invention. Logic in Databases, 457–474 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hull, R., Yoshikawa, M.: ILOG: Declarative Creation and Manipulation of Object Identifiers. In: VLDB 1990, pp. 455–468 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eiter, T., et al.: A Uniform Integration of Higher-Order Reasoning and External Evaluations in Answer Set Programming. In: IJCAI 2005, pp. 90–96 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heymans, S., Van Nieuwenborgh, D., Vermeir, D.: Nonmonotonic ontological and rule-based reasoning with extended conceptual logic programs. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 392–407. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Leone, N., et al.: The DLV System for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. ACM TOCL (to appear, 2006), http://www.arxiv.org/ps/cs.AI/0211004

  7. Simons, P., Niemelä, I., Soininen, T.: Extending and Implementing the Stable Model Semantics. Artificial Intelligence 138, 181–234 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Calimeri, F., Ianni, G.: External Sources of Computation for Answer Set Solvers. In: Baral, C., Greco, G., Leone, N., Terracina, G. (eds.) LPNMR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3662, pp. 105–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Syrjänen, T.: Omega-restricted logic programs. In: Eiter, T., Faber, W., Truszczyński, M. (eds.) LPNMR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2173, pp. 267–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bonatti, P.A.: Reasoning with Infinite Stable Models. In: IJCAI 2001, pp. 603–610 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Friend of a Friend (FOAF) Project, http://www.foaf-project.org/

  12. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical Negation in Logic Programs and Disjunctive Databases. New Generation Computing 9, 365–385 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lifschitz, V., Turner, H.: Splitting a Logic Program. In: ICLP 1994, pp. 23–37 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dovier, A., Pontelli, E., Rossi, G.: Set unification. In: TPLP (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heymans, S., Van Nieuwenborgh, D., Vermeir, D.: Semantic web reasoning with conceptual logic programs. In: Antoniou, G., Boley, H. (eds.) RuleML 2004. LNCS, vol. 3323, pp. 113–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Cabibbo, L.: The Expressive Power of Stratified Logic Programs with Value Invention. Inf. and Comp. 147(1), 22–56 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Nonmonotonic description logic programs: Implementation and experiments. In: Baader, F., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3452, pp. 511–527. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Calimeri, F., Cozza, S., Ianni, G. (2006). Decidable Fragments of Logic Programming with Value Invention. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4160. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-39625-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39627-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics