Skip to main content

Incomplete Knowledge in Hybrid Probabilistic Logic Programs

  • Conference paper
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4160))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Although negative conclusions are presented implicitly in Normal Hybrid Probabilistic Programs (NHPP) [26] through the closed world assumption, representing and reasoning with explicit negation is needed in NHPP to allow the ability to reason with incomplete knowledge. In this paper we extend the language of NHPP to explicitly encode classical negation in addition to non-monotonic negation. The semantics of the extended language is based on the answer set semantics of traditional logic programming [9]. We show that the proposed semantics is a natural extension to the answer set semantics of traditional logic programming [9]. In addition, the proposed semantics is reduced to stable probabilistic model semantics of NHPP [26]. The importance of that is computational methods developed for NHPP can be applied to the proposed language. Furthermore, we show that some commonsense probabilistic knowledge can be easily represented in the proposed language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baral, C.: Knowledge representation, reasoning, and declarative problem solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral, C., et al.: Probabilistic reasoning with answer sets. In: 7th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Viegas Damásio, C., Moniz Pereira, L., Swift, T.: Coherent well-founded annotated logic programs. In: Gelfond, M., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G. (eds.) LPNMR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1730, p. 262. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dekhtyar, A., Dekhtyar, I.: Possible worlds semantics for probabilistic logic programs. In: International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 137–148 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dekhtyar, A., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Hybrid probabilistic program. Journal of Logic Programming 43(3), 187–250 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dekhtyar, M., Dekhtyar, A., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Hybrid Probabilistic Programs: Algorithms and Complexity. In: Proc. of UAI Conference, pp. 160–169 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Gelder, A., Ross, K.A., Schlipf, J.S.: The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. Journal of ACM 38(3), 620–650 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: ICSLP. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9(3-4), 363–385 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kersting, K., De Raedt, L.: Bayesian Logic Programs. In: Inductive LP (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kifer, M., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Theory of generalized annotated logic programming and its applications. Journal of Logic Programming 12, 335–367 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lakshmanan, L.V.S., Sadri, F.: On a theory of probabilistic deductive databases. Journal of Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 1(1), 5–42 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Loyer, Y., Straccia, U.: The well-founded semantics in normal logic programs with uncertainty. In: Hu, Z., Rodríguez-Artalejo, M. (eds.) FLOPS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2441. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Loyer, Y., Straccia, U.: The approximate well-founded semantics for logic programs with uncertainty. In: Rovan, B., Vojtáš, P. (eds.) MFCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2747, pp. 541–550. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic logic programming. In: 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 388–392 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muggleton, S.: Stochastic logic programming. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Probabilistic logic programming. Information & Computation 101(2) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: A semantical framework for supporting subjective and conditional probabilities in deductive databases. ARJ 10(2) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Stable semantics for probabilistic deductive databases. Information & Computation 110(1) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nicolas, P., Garcia, L., Stphan, I.: Possibilistic stable models. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Niemela, I., Simons, P.: Efficient implementation of the well-founded and stable model semantics. In: Joint International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming, pp. 289–303 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Poole, D.: The Independent choice logic for modelling multiple agents under uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence 94(1-2), 7–56 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Poole, D.: Abducing through negation as failure: stable models within the independent choice logic. Journal of Logic Programming 44, 5–35 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Saad, E., Pontelli, E.: Towards a more practical hybrid probabilistic logic programming framework. In: Hermenegildo, M.V., Cabeza, D. (eds.) PADL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3350, pp. 67–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Saad, E., Pontelli, E.: Hybrid probabilistic logic programs with non-monotonic negation. In: Gabbrielli, M., Gupta, G. (eds.) ICLP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3668, pp. 204–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Vennekens, J., Verbaeten, S., Bruynooghe, M.: Logic programs with annotated disjunctions. In: Demoen, B., Lifschitz, V. (eds.) ICLP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3132, pp. 431–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saad, E. (2006). Incomplete Knowledge in Hybrid Probabilistic Logic Programs. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4160. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11853886_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-39625-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39627-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics