Skip to main content

Incorporating Landmarks with Quality Measures in Routing Procedures

  • Conference paper
Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4197))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present an approach to providing landmark-based routes using a shortest-path algorithm. We start from the assumption, that at one junction there can be several landmarks to choose among, in order to find an optimal description of a route. The landmark selection used for describing the route is optimized taking the quality measures for the landmarks into account. Therefore, it is necessary to define quality measures. In the paper different types of quality measures are introduced and their integration in the route graph, as well as in a routing algorithm is presented. The usability of the approach is demonstrated using test data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daniel, M.-P., Denis, M.: Spatial descriptions as navigational aids: A cognitive analysis of route directions. Kognitionswissenschaft 7, 45–52 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., Bertolo, L.: Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13, 145–174 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tversky, B., Lee, P.: Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D. (eds.) Spatial Information Theory: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, pp. 51–64. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Sorrows, M., Hirtle, S.: The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: Freksa, C., Mark, D. (eds.) Spatial Information Theory: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, pp. 37–50. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Nothegger, C., Winter, S., Raubal, M.: Computation of the salience of features. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4, 113–136 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Winter, S.: Route adaptive selection of salient features. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 349–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Klippel, A., Winter, S.: Structural salience of landmarks for route directions. In: Cohn, A.G., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 347–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Habel, C.: Pictorial representations of routes: Chunking route segments during comprehension. In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition III. LNCS, vol. 2685, pp. 11–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Elias, B.: Extracting landmarks with data mining methods. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 375–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Elias, B., Brenner, C.: Automatic generation and application of landmarks in navigation data sets. In: Fisher, P. (ed.) Developments in Spatial Data Handling, pp. 469–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elias, B.: Extraktion von Landmarken für die Navigation. Ph.D thesis, Universität Hannover (in press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dijkstra, E.W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. In: Numerische Mathematik, vol. 1, pp. 269–271. Springer, Heidelberg (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duckham, M., Kulik, L.: “Simplest” paths: Automated route selection for navigation. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 169–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Caduff, D., Timpf, S.: The landmark spider: Representing landmark knowledge for wayfinding tasks. In: Barkowsky, T., Freksa, C., Hegarty, M., Lowe, R. (eds.) Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance, pp. 30–35. AAAI Press, Stanford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winter, S.: Modeling costs of turns in route planning. GeoInformatica 6, 345–361 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Golledge, R.G.: Path selection and route preference in human navigation: A progress report. In: Kuhn, W., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, pp. 207–222. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Golledge, R.D.: Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In: Wayfinding Behavior, pp. 5–45. John Hopkins Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dalton, R.C.: The secret is to follow your nose: Route path selection and angularity. Environment and Behavior 35, 107–131 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, G.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63, 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mark, D.M.: Automated route selection for navigation. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine 1, 2–5 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Richter, K.-F., Klippel, A.: A model for context-specific route directions. In: Freksa, C., Knauff, M., Krieg-Brückner, B., Nebel, B., Barkowsky, T. (eds.) Spatial Cognition IV. LNCS, vol. 3343, pp. 58–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Richter, K.-F., Klippel, A., Freksa, C.: Shortest, fastest, - but what next? a different approach to route directions. In: Raubal, M., Sliwinski, A., Kuhn, W. (eds.) Geoinformation und Mobilität - von der Forschung zur praktischen Anwendung. Beiträge zu den Münsteraner GI-Tagen 2004, IfGIprints, Institut für Geoinformatik; Münster, pp. 205–217 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Burnett, G., Smith, D., May, A.: Supporting the navigation task: Characteristics of ’good’ landmarks. In: Hanson, M.A. (ed.) Contempory Ergonomics 2001, pp. 441–446. Taylor and Francis, Abington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maaß, W.: How spatial information connects visual perception and natural language generation in dynamic environments. In: Frank, A., Kuhn, W. (eds.) Spatial Information Theory, pp. 223–240. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elias, B., Sester, M. (2006). Incorporating Landmarks with Quality Measures in Routing Procedures. In: Raubal, M., Miller, H.J., Frank, A.U., Goodchild, M.F. (eds) Geographic Information Science. GIScience 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4197. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11863939_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11863939_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44526-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44528-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics