Skip to main content

Nash Equilibrium for Upward-Closed Objectives

  • Conference paper
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4207))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study infinite stochastic games played by n-players on a finite graph with goals specified by sets of infinite traces. The games are concurrent (each player simultaneously and independently chooses an action at each round), stochastic (the next state is determined by a probability distribution depending on the current state and the chosen actions), infinite (the game continues for an infinite number of rounds), nonzero-sum (the players’ goals are not necessarily conflicting), and undiscounted. We show that if each player has an upward-closed objective, then there exists an ε-Nash equilibrium in memoryless strategies, for every ε>0; and exact Nash equilibria need not exist. Upward-closure of an objective means that if a set Z of infinitely repeating states is winning, then all supersets of Z of infinitely repeating states are also winning. Memoryless strategies are strategies that are independent of history of plays and depend only on the current state. We also study the complexity of finding values (payoff profile) of an ε-Nash equilibrium. We show that the values of an ε-Nash equilibrium in nonzero-sum concurrent games with upward-closed objectives for all players can be computed by computing ε-Nash equilibrium values of nonzero-sum concurrent games with reachability objectives for all players and a polynomial procedure. As a consequence we establish that values of an ε-Nash equilibrium can be computed in TFNP (total functional NP), and hence in EXPTIME.

This research was supported in part by the NSF grants CCR-0225610 and CCR-0234690, and by the SNSF under the Indo-Swiss Joint Research Programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chatterjee, K.: Two-player nonzero-sum ω-regular games. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds.) CONCUR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3653, pp. 413–427. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Chatterjee, K., Majumdar, R., Jurdziński, M.: On Nash equilibria in stochastic games. In: Marcinkowski, J., Tarlecki, A. (eds.) CSL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3210, pp. 26–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Courcoubetis, C., Yannakakis, M.: The complexity of probabilistic verification. JACM 42(4), 857–907 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. de Alfaro, L.: Formal Verification of Probabilistic Systems. PhD thesis, Stanford University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Alfaro, L.: Computing minimum and maximum reachability times in probabilistic systems. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Mauw, S. (eds.) CONCUR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1664, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Filar, J., Vrieze, K.: Competitive Markov Decision Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fink, A.M.: Equilibrium in a stochastic n-person game. Journal of Science of Hiroshima University 28, 89–93 (1964)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nash Jr., J.F.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academny of Sciences USA 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, D.A.: The determinacy of Blackwell games. Journal of Symbolic Logic 63(4), 1565–1581 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Owen, G.: Game Theory. Academic Press, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Papadimitriou, C.H.: On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence. JCSS 48(3), 498–532 (1994)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Secchi, P., Sudderth, W.D.: Stay-in-a-set games. International Journal of Game Theory 30, 479–490 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapley, L.S.: Stochastic games. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 39, 1095–1100 (1953)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, W.: Languages, automata, and logic. In: Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 3, ch. 7, pp. 389–455. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vieille, N.: Two player stochastic games I: a reduction. Israel Journal of Mathematics 119, 55–91 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Vieille, N.: Two player stochastic games II: the case of recursive games. Israel Journal of Mathematics 119, 93–126 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chatterjee, K. (2006). Nash Equilibrium for Upward-Closed Objectives. In: Ésik, Z. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4207. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11874683_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11874683_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45458-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45459-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics