Abstract
In this paper we describe how an evidential-reasoner can be used as a component of risk assessment of engineering projects using a direct way of reasoning. Guan & Bell (1991) introduced this method by using the mass functions to express rule strengths. Mass functions are also used to express data strengths. The data and rule strengths are combined to get a mass distribution for each rule; i.e., the first half of our reasoning process. Then we combine the prior mass and the evidence from the different rules; i.e., the second half of the reasoning process. Finally, belief intervals are calculated to help in identifying the risks. We apply our evidential-reasoner on an engineering project and the results demonstrate the feasibility and applicability of this system in this environment.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addison, T.: E-commerce project development risks: evidence from a Delphi survey. International Journal of Information Management 1, 25–40 (2003)
Baloi, D., Price, A.D.F.: Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management 21(4), 261–269 (2003)
Carr, V., Tah, J.H.M.: A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system. Advances in Engineering Software 32(10), 847–857 (2001)
Charette, R.N.: Why software fails [software failure]. Spectrum 42(9), 42–49 (2005)
Guan, J.W., Bell, D.A.: Evidence theory and its applications. Studies in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence 7, vol. 1. Elsevier, The Netherlands (1991)
Guan, J.W., Bell, D.A.: Evidence theory and its applications. Studies in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence 8, vol. 2. Elsevier, The Netherlands (1992)
Ngai, E.W.T., Wat, F.K.T.: Fuzzy decision support system for risk analysis in ecommerce development. Journal of Decision Support Systems 40(2), 235–255 (2005)
Rashid, H.K., David, A.B., Guan, J.W., QingXiang, W.: Risk Assessment of ECommerce Projects using Evidential Reasoning. In: Wang, L., Jiao, L., Shi, G., Li, X., Liu, J. (eds.) FSKD 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4223, pp. 621–630. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Standish Group International, 2004 Standish Group International, Inc, 2004 Third Quarter Research Report (2004)
Yen, J.A.: Reasoning model based on an extended Dempster-Shafer theory. In: Proceedings aaai, pp. 125–131 (1986)
Yen, J.: GERTIS: A Dempster-Shafer Approach to Diagnosing Hierarchical Hypotheses. Communications of the ACM 5 32, 573–585 (1989)
Zed, H., Martin, S.: Assessment and evaluation of contractor data against client goals using PERT approach. Construction Management & Economics 15(4), 327–340 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khokhar, R.H., Bell, D.A., Guan, J., Wu, Q. (2006). Knowledge-Based Risk Assessment Under Uncertainty in Engineering Projects. In: Corchado, E., Yin, H., Botti, V., Fyfe, C. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2006. IDEAL 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4224. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11875581_154
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11875581_154
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45485-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45487-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)