Skip to main content

Reduced Attribute Oriented Inconsistency Handling in Decision Generation

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2006 (IDEAL 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4224))

  • 1234 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the discarded attributes, the effectual condition classes of the decision rules are highly different. To provide a unified evaluative measure, the derivation of each rule is depicted by the reduced attributes with a layered manner. Therefore, the inconsistency is divided into two primary categories in terms of the reduced attributes. We introduce the notion of joint membership function wrt. the effectual joint attributes, and a classification method extended from the default decision generation framework is proposed to handle the inconsistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: A rough set approach to decision rules generation, Research Report 23/93, Warsaw University of Technology, 1–19 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Taylor, C.C.: Machine learning, neural and statistical classification. Ellis Horwood, New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1, 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grzymala-Busse, J.W.: A new version of the rule induction system LERS. Fundamenta Informaticae 31, 27–39 (1887)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mollesta, T., Skowron, A.: A rough set framework for data mining of propositional default rules. In: 9th Int. Sym. Proc. On Found. of Intelligent Systems, pp. 448–457 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bazan, J., Nguyen, H.S., Synak, P., Wrblewski, J.: Rough set algorithms in classification problems. Rough set methods and applications. New Developments in Knowledge Discovery in Information Systems, Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 49–88 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Skowron, A., Wang, H., Wojna, A., Bazan, J.G.: A hierarchical approach to multimodal classification. In: RSFDGrC 2005, vol. 2, pp. 119–127 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, G.Y., Wu, Y., Liu, F.: Generating rules and reasoning under inconsistencies. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Ind. Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, pp. 2536–2541 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grzymalao-Busse, J.W., Hu, M.: A comparison of several approaches to missing attribute values in data mining. In: Ziarko, W.P., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSCTC 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2005, p. 378. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dzeroski, S.: Normalized decision functions and measures for inconsistent decision tables analysis. Fundamenta Informaticae 44(3), 291–319 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feng, Y., Li, W., Lv, Z., Ma, X. (2006). Reduced Attribute Oriented Inconsistency Handling in Decision Generation. In: Corchado, E., Yin, H., Botti, V., Fyfe, C. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2006. IDEAL 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4224. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11875581_96

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11875581_96

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-45485-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45487-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics