Skip to main content

Assessing the Quality of Mappings Between Semantic Resources in Construction

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture (EG-ICE 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4200))

  • 2755 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses how to map between Semantic Resources (SRs) specifically created to represent knowledge in the Construction Sector and how to measure and assess the quality of such mappings. In particular results from the FUNSIEC project are presented, which investigated the feasibility of establishing semantic mappings among Construction-oriented SRs. The paper points to the next lines of inquiry to extend such work. In FUNSIEC, a ‘Semantic Infrastructure’ was built using SRs that were semantically mapped among them. After quite positive results from FUNSIEC, the obvious questions arose: how good are the mappings? Can we trust them? Can we use them? This paper presents FUNSIEC research (approach, methodology, and results) and the main directions of investigation to support its continuation, which is based on the application of fuzzy logics to qualify the mappings produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barresi, S., Rezgui, Y., Lima, C., Meziane, F.: Architecture to Support Semantic Resources Interoperability. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on Interoperability of Heterogeneous Information Systems (IHIS 2005), Germany, pp. 79–82. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Lima, C., Ferreira da Silva, C., Sousa, P., Pimentão, J.P., Le-Duc, C.: Interoperability among Semantic Resources in Construction: Is it Feasible? In: CIB-W78 Conference, Dresden, Germany (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American (May 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corcho, O., Fernando-Lopez, M., Gomez-Perez, A.: Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data and Knowledge Engineering 46, 41–64 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez-Lopez, M.: Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 1999 workshop on ontologies and problem-solving methods (KRR5), Stockholm, August 2 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lima, C., Storer, G., Zarli, A., Ferreira da Silva, C.: Towards a framework for managing standards-base semantic e-Resources in the European Construction Industry. In: Construction Research Congress 2005. ASCE, Chicago, EUA(vol. & page numbers) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Benerecetti, M., Bouquet, P., Zanobini, S.: Soundness of Semantic Methods for Schema Matching. In: Bouquet, P., Serafini, L. (eds.) Workshop on Meaning Coordination and Negotiation (MCN 2004) at the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference, Working notes, Hiroshima, Japan, November 8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Euzenat, J., Le Bach, T., Barrasa, J., Bouquet, P., De Bo, J., Dieng, R., et al.: D2.2.3: State of the art on ontology alignment – Knowledge Web project, realizing the semantic web, IST-2004-507482 Programme of the Commission of the European Communities (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lima, C.P., Fiès, B., Lefrancois, G., Diraby, T.E.: The challenge of using a domain Ontology in KM solutions: the e-COGNOS experience. In: 10TH ISPE 2003, International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Funchal, Portugal, pp. 771–778 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1), 1–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Noy, N., Musen, M.: Anchor-PROMPT: Using non-local context for semantic matching. In: Proc. IJCAI 2001 workshop on ontology and information sharing, Seattle (WA US), pp. 63–70 (2001), http://sunsite.informatik.rwthaachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-47/

  13. Xiaomeng, S.: Improving Semantic Interoperability through Analysis of Model Extension. In: Proc. of CAiSE 2003 Doctoral Consortium Velden, Austria (2003), http://www.vf-utwente.nl/~xsu/paper/docConstCRD.pdg

  14. Garcia, A.C.B., Kunz, J., Ekstrom, M., Kiviniemi, A.: Building a project ontology with extreme collaboration and virtual design and construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(2), 71–85 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lima, C., da Silva, C.F., Pimentão, J.P. (2006). Assessing the Quality of Mappings Between Semantic Resources in Construction. In: Smith, I.F.C. (eds) Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture. EG-ICE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4200. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46246-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46247-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics