Skip to main content

Constructing Design Representations

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture (EG-ICE 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4200))

  • 2747 Accesses

Abstract

Supporting the early phases of design requires, among others, support for the specification and use of multiple and evolving representations, and for the exchange of information between these representations. We consider a complex adaptive system as a model for the development of design representations, and present a semi-constructive algebraic formalism for design representations, termed sorts, as a candidate for supporting this approach. We analyze sorts with respect to the requirements of a complex adaptive system and compare it to other representational formalisms that consider a constructive approach to representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AIA Model Support Group: IFC2x Edition 3. International Alliance for Interoperability (2006) (May 1, 2006), http://www.iai-international.org/Model/R2x3_final/index.htm

  2. Aït-Kaci, H.: A lattice theoretic approach to computation based on a calculus of partially ordered type structures (property inheritance, semantic nets, graph unification). Ph.D. Diss. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Datta, S.: Modeling dialogue with mixed initiative in design space exploration. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 20, 129–142 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dooley, K.J.: A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 1, 69–97 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kooistra, J.: Flowing. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 19, 123–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krishnamurti, R., Stouffs, R.: The boundary of a shape and its classification. The Journal of Design Research 4(1) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manola, F., Miller, E. (eds.): RDF Primer. W3C World Wide Web Consortium (2004) (May 1, 2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/

  9. Park, K., Krishnamurti, R.: Flexible design representation for construction. In: Lee, H.S., Choi, J.W. (eds.) CAADRIA 2004, pp. 671–680. Yonsei University Press, Seoul (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Park, K., Krishnamurti, R.: The digital diary of a building. In: Bhatt, A. (ed.) CAADRIA 2005, vol. 2, pp. 15–25. TVB School of Habitat Studies, New Delhi (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prigogine, I., Stengers, I.: Order out of Chaos. Bantam Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stiny, G.: Weights. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 19, 413–430 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stouffs, R., Krishnamurti, R.: On a query language for weighted geometries. In: Moselhi, O., Bedard, C., Alkass, S. (eds.) Third Canadian Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, pp. 783–793. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montreal (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stouffs, R., Krishnamurti, R.: The extensibility and applicability of geometric representations. In: Architecture proceedings of 3rd Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning Conference, pp. 436–452. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stouffs, R., Krishnamurti, R., Cumming, M.: Mapping design information by manipulating representational structures. In: Akın, Ö., Krishnamurti, R., Lam, K.P. (eds.) Generative CAD Systems, School of Architecture, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, pp. 387–400 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stouffs, R., Krishnamurti, R., Eastman, C.M.: A Formal Structure for Nonequivalent Solid Representations. In: Finger, S., Mäntylä, M., Tomiyama, T. (eds.) Proc. IFIP WG 5.2 Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD II. IFIP WG 5.2, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 269–289 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. van Leeuwen, J.P., Hendrickx, A., Fridqvist, S.: Towards dynamic information modelling in architectural design. In: Proc. CIB-W78 International Conference IT in Construction in Africa, pp. 19.1–19.14. CSIR, Pretoria (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Woodbury, R., Burrow, A., Datta, S., Chang, T.: Typed feature structures and design space exploration. Artificial Intelligence in Design, Engineering and Manufacturing 13, 287–302 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stouffs, R., ter Haar, A. (2006). Constructing Design Representations. In: Smith, I.F.C. (eds) Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture. EG-ICE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4200. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46246-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46247-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics