Skip to main content

Methodologies for Construction Informatics Research

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture (EG-ICE 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4200))

Abstract

Construction informatics is a rather new topic in civil engineering and as such its rules of scientific investigation are not as mature as with topics with a longer tradition. The paper argues that construction informatics has elements in common with both natural sciences, mathematics, technology as well as humanities and therefore a broad scope of methodological apparatus is available, including that of humanities. Some current methods are criticized and action research and Socratic methods suggested as an alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD, Frascati Manual, OECD Publication Services (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blaikie, N.: Approaches to Social Enquiry. Polity Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schutz, A.: Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action. The Problem of Social Reality, vol. 1. Martinus Hijhoff, The Hague (1962) (Collected Papers)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petroski, H.: Design Paradigms. Cambridge University Press, UK (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dye, J.: Socratic Method and Scientific Method (1996), http://www.soci.niu.edu/~phildept/Dye/method.html

  6. Gielingh, W.: General AEC reference model (GARM). In: Christiansson, P., Karlsson, H. (eds.) Conceptual modelling of buildings. CIB W74+W78 seminar. CIB proceedings, Lund university and the Swedish building centre, October 1988, p. 126 (1988), http://itc.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?w78-1988-165

  7. de Kleer, J., Brown, J.S.: Assumptions and Ambiguities in Mechanistic Mental Models. In: Gentner, D., Stevens, A.L. (eds.) Mental Models, pp. 155–190. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henson, B., Juster, N., de Pennington, A.: Towards an Integrated Representation of Function, Behavior and Form. In: Sharpe, J., Oh, V. (eds.) Computer Aided Conceptual Design, Proceedings of the 1994 Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design, Lancaster University EDC, pp. 95–111 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qian, L., Gero, J.S.: Function-Behavior-Structure Paths and Their Role in Analogy-Based Design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 289–312 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., Nielsen, P.A.: Action research. Communications of the ACM 42(1) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Popper, K.: The logic of scientific discovery, Routledge Classics (2002) (first published in German in 1935)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Susman, G.I., Evered, R.D.: An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23(4), 582–603 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feyerabend, P.: Against Method Verso, London (1978)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Turk, Ž. (2006). Methodologies for Construction Informatics Research. In: Smith, I.F.C. (eds) Intelligent Computing in Engineering and Architecture. EG-ICE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4200. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11888598_59

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46246-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46247-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics