Abstract
The knowledge engineering offers a rational framework allowing a representation of knowledge obtained through the experiences. This technique found a great application in knowledge management and especially to capital ize knowledge. In fact, the rational representation of knowledge allows their exploitation and their re-use. It is a necessary condition to allow a re-use and a knowledge appropriation. The knowledge management must take into account this dimension, since its first concern is to make knowledge persistent, ready to be re-used. In this paper, we study the traces classifications of the design pro ject achievements in order to have a knowledge aggregation and to thus provide a representation of handled knowledge: directives and competences organiza tion as well as negotiation strategies and cooperative problems solving.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J.: The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press (1983)
Baker, M.J.: Recherche sur l’élaboration de connaissances dans le dialogue, HDR, Univ Nancy2 (2004)
Bekhti, S., Matta, N.: Project memory: An approach of modelling and reusing the context and the design rationale. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2003 (International joint of conferences of Artificial Intelligence) Workshop on knowledge management and organisational memory, Acapulco (2003)
Benzecri, J.P.: Data analyzes. T1: La taxinomie. Dunod (1973)
Chavent, M., Guinot, C., Lechevallier, Y.: Divisives Methode of classification. Inria., Rocquencourt (1999)
Clark, H.H., Schaefer, E.F.: Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science 13, 259–294 (1989)
Conein, B.: Ethologie and sociologie: la contribution de l’éthologie à la théorie de l’interaction sociale. French Revue of Sociologie XXXIII(1), 87–104 (1992)
Darses, F., et Falzon, P.: Collective design: une approche de l’ergonomie cognitive, Coopération et conception, sous la direction de G. De Terssac et E. Friedberg aux éditions Octares (1996)
Diday, E.: Une représentation visuelle des classes empiétantes. Rapport INRIA, n- 291. Recquoncourt 78150, France (1884)
Ducrot, O.: Les échelles argumentatives, Paris, Minuit (1982)
Herrmann, T., Jahnke, I.: The Role Concept as a Basis for Designing Community Systems (2004)
Jain, A.K., Dubes, R.: Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)
Johnson, S.C.: Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32, 241–254 (1967)
Karsenty, L.: An Empirical Evaluation of Design Rationale Documents. In: Bilger, R., Guest, S., Tauber, M.J. (eds.) Proceedings of CHI (1996)
Kerbrat-Orechioni, C.: Le discours en interactions. A. Colin, Paris (2005)
Matta, N., Ribiere, M., Corby, O., Lewkowicz, M., Zacklad, M.: Project Memory in Design. In: Roy, R. (ed.) Industrial Knowledge Management - A Micro Level Approach, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Matta, N., Eynard, B., Roucoules, L., Lemercier, M.: Continuous capitalization of design knowledge. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2002 (European conferences of Artificial Intelligence) Workshop on knowledge management and organisational memory, Lyon (2002)
Moeschler, J.: Modélisation du Dialogue. Hermès, Paris (1989)
Nakache, J.P., Confias, J.: Méthodes de Classification., CISIA. CERESTA edition Mars, pp. 5–54 (2000)
Ohlsson, S.: Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling. In: Reiman dans, P., Spade et, H. (dirs.), Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, pp. 37–62. Elsevier Science, Oxford (1996)
Plantin, C.: L’argumentation. Seuil, Paris (1996)
Pléty, R., cooperative learning. Presses Universitaires de Lyon, Lyon (1996)
Richard, J.F.: Les activités mentales, Comprendre, raisonner, trouver des solutions, Armand Colin, Paris (1990)
Roulet, E.: On the Structure of Conversation as Negotiation. In: Parret, H., Verschueren, J. (eds.) (On) Searle on Conversation, pp. 91–100. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1992)
Toulmin, S.: The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Djaiz, C., Matta, N. (2006). Project Situations Aggregation to Identify Cooperative Problem Solving Strategies. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4251. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11892960_83
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11892960_83
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46535-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46536-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)