Skip to main content

Trust in LORA: Towards a Formal Definition of Trust in BDI Agents

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4252))

Abstract

Trust plays a fundamental role in multi-agent systems in which tasks are delegated or agents must rely on others to perform actions that they themselves cannot do. Dating from the mid-1980s, the Belief-Desire-Intention architecture (BDI) is the longest-standing model of intelligent agency used in multi-agent systems. Part of the attraction of BDI is that it is amenable to logical formalisms such as Wooldridge’s Logic Of Rational Agents (LORA). In a previous paper the present authors introduced a model of trust, here named the Ability-Belief-Commitment-Desire (ABCD) model, that could be implemented within the BDI framework. This paper explores the definition of the ABCD model within the LORA formalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AOS: JACK Intelligent Agents: JACK Manual, Release 5.0, Agent Oriented Software, Pty Ltd (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Huang, Z., van der Torre, L.: Trust and Commitment in Dynamic Logic. In: Shafazand, H., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) EurAsia-ICT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2510, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–256 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dignum, F., Kinny, D., Sonenburg, L.: From Desires, Obligations and Norms to Goals. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3-4), 407–430 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. d’Inverno, M., Kinny, D., Luck, M., Wooldridge, M.: ’A Formal Specification of dMARS’. In: Rao, A., Singh, M.P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) ATAL 1997. LNCS, vol. 1365, Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, Y.: Sometimes and not ever revisited: on branching time versus linear time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 33(1), 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.L.: Procedural Knowledge. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 74, pp. 1383–1398 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Girle, R.A.: Modal Logics and Philosophy, Acumen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hodgson, A., Rönnquist, R., Busetta, P.: Specification of Coordinated Agent Behavior (The SimpleTeam Approach). In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Team Behaviour and Plan Recognition at IJCAI (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huber, M.: JAM: A BDI-theoretic mobile agent architecture. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 1999), pp. 236–243. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarvis, B., Corbett, D., Jain, L.: Beyond Trust: A BDI Model for Building Confidence in an Agent’s Intentions. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Knowledge-based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, KES 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3682, Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, R.C.: A formal theory of knowledge and action. In: Allen, J.F., Hendler, J., Tate, A. (eds.) Readings in Planning, pp. 480–519. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. O’Hara, K., Shadbolt, N.: Knowledge technologies and the semantic web, In: Trust and Crime in Information Societies, Edward Elgar (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning About Rational Agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jarvis, B., Jain, L. (2006). Trust in LORA: Towards a Formal Definition of Trust in BDI Agents. In: Gabrys, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4252. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11893004_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11893004_59

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46537-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46539-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics