Skip to main content

Use Case Modeling and Refinement: A Quality-Based Approach

  • Conference paper
Book cover Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006 (ER 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4215))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a quality-based use case refinement approach. It consists of a step by step refinement process that combines quality metrics with use case transformation rules. We propose several quality metrics, based on complexity concepts, aimed at measuring the complexity of use cases. Starting from an initial use case, we apply successively a set of transformation rules and measure the resulting use case based on the quality metrics. Our approach is embedded in a general framework allowing us to guide software designers by the mean of quality metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Costagliola, G., Ferrucci, F., Tortora, G., Vitiello, G.: Class Point: An Approach for the Size Estimation of Object-Oriented Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briand, L., Langley, T., Wieczorek, I.: A Replicated Assessment and Comparison of Common Software Cost Modeling Techniques, International Software Engineering Network Technical Report ISERN-99-15

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kusumoto, S., Matukawa, F., Inoue, K., Hanabusa, S.: Estimating Effort by Use Case Points: Method, Tool and Case Study. In: 10th IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS 2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briand, L., Daly, J., Wüst, J.: A Unified Framework for Coupling Measurement in OO Systems. ISERN-96-14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arisholm, E., Briand, L., Foyen, A.: Dynamic Coupling Measurement for OO Software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(8) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chatzigeorgiou, A., Stephanides, G.: Entropy as a Measure of Object-Oriented Design Quality (BCI 2003), Thessaloniki, Greece (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dvorak, J.: Conceptual Entropy and Its Effect on Class Hierarchies. IEEE Computer (June 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, R.: OO Design Quality Metrics – An Analysis of Dependencies, http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/articles/oodmetrc.pdf

  9. Genero, M., Piattini, M., Calero, C. (eds.): Metrics for Software Conceptual Models. Imperial College Press (January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Si-Saïd, S., Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I.: Conceptual Modeling Quality - From EER to UML Schemas Evaluation. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol. 2503, p. 414. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. El Emam, K.: Object-Oriented Metrics: A Review of Theory and Practice, NRC-CNRC 44190, National Research Council Canada

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baig, I.: Measuring Cohesion and Coupling of OO Systems, Master Thesis, School of Engineering, Ronneby, Sweden (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Azuma, M.: Applying ISO/IEC 9126-1 Quality Model to Quality Requirements Engineering on Critical Software. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Requirements for High Assurance Systems (RHAS 2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaiya, H., Osada, A., Kaijiri, K.: Identifying Stakeholders and Their Preferences about NFR by Comparing Use Case Diagrams of Several Existing Systems. In: 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, W., Li, J., Butler, G.: Refactoring Use Case Models on Episodes. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://www.omg.org

  17. Cockburn, A.: Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amyot, D., Mussbacher, G.: On the Extension of UML with Use Case Maps Concepts. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) UML 2000. LNCS, vol. 1939, pp. 16–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buhr, R.J.A., Casselman, R.S.: Use Case Maps for Object-Oriented Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Regnell, B., Beremark, P., Eklundh, O.: A Market-Driven Requirements Engineering Process Results from an Industrial Process Improvement Programme. CEIRE 1998 - Journal of Requirements Engineering 3(2), 121–129 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rui, K., Butler, G.: Refactoring use case models: the metamodel. In: Proc. Twenty-sixth Australasian computer science conference on Conference in research and practice in information technology, pp. 301–308. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Henderson-Sellers, B., Zowghi, D., Klemola, T., Parasuram, S.: Sizing Use Cases: How to Create a Standard Metrical Approach. In: Bellahsène, Z., Patel, D., Rolland, C. (eds.) OOIS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2425, p. 409. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Anda, B., Dreiem, H., Sjøberg, D., Jørgensen, M.: Estimating Software Development Effort Based on Use Cases - Experiences from Industry, I. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, p. 487. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harisson, W.: An entropy base measure of software complexity. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 18(11), 1025–1029 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bansiya, J., Davis, C., Etzkorn, L.: An entropy-based complexity measure for object-oriented designs. Theory and Practice of Object Systems 5 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fenton, N.E., Lawrence Pfleeger, S.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and PracticalApproach. PWS Publishing Company (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chidamber, S., Kemerer, C.: A metrics suite for OO design. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 20, 476–493 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Henderson-Sellers, B.: Object-Oriented Metrics measures of Complexity. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cherfi, S.Ss., Akoka, J., Comyn-Wattiau, I. (2006). Use Case Modeling and Refinement: A Quality-Based Approach. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47224-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47227-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics