Abstract
Ontologies play an indispensable role in the Semantic Web by specifying the definitions of concepts and individual objects. However, most of the existing methods for constructing ontologies can only specify concepts as crisp sets. However, we cannot avoid encountering concepts that are without clear boundaries, or even vague in meanings. Therefore, existing ontology models are unable to cope with many real cases effectively. With respect to a certain category, certain objects are considered as more representative or typical. Cognitive psychologists explain this by the prototype theory of concepts. This notion should also be taken into account to improve conceptual modeling. While there has been different research attempting to handle vague concepts with fuzzy set theory, formal methods for measuring typicality of objects are still insufficient. We propose a cognitive model of concepts for ontologies, which handles both likeliness (fuzzy membership grade) and typicality of individuals. We also discuss the nature and differences between likeliness and typicality. This model not only enhances the effectiveness of conceptual modeling, but also brings the results of reasoning closer to human thinking. We believe that this research is beneficial to future research on ontological engineering in the Semantic Web.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, S.L., Gleitman, L.R., Gleitman, H.: What some concepts might not be. Cognition 13(3), 263–308 (1983)
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001)
Cross, V.: Uncertainty in the automation of ontology matching. In: 4th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modelling and Analysis (2003)
Cross, V., Voss, C.R.: Fuzzy ontologies for multilingual document exploitation. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of NAFIPS, pp. 392–397 (1999)
Ding, Y., Foo, S.: Ontology research and development part 1 – a review of ontology generation. Journal of Information Science 28(2) (2002)
Ding, Y., Foo, S.: Research and development: Part 2 – a review of ontology mapping and evolving. Journal of Information Science 28(4) (2002)
Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rossazza, J.P.: Vagueness, typicality, and uncertainty in class hierarchies. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 6, 167–183 (1991)
Baader, F., et al. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Galotti, K.M.: Cognitive Psychology In and Out of the Laboratory, 3rd edn. Wadsworth, Belmont (2004)
Gómez-Pérez, A., Manzano-Macho, D.: An overview of methods and tools for ontology learning from texts. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 19(3), 187–212 (2004)
Grossi, D., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Contextual taxonomies. In: Proceedings of Fifth Internationanal Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (2004)
Grossi, D., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Context in categorization. In: Workshop on Context Representation and Reasoning (2005)
Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)
Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information system. In: Proceedings of the Formal Ontology and Information System (1998)
Guha, R., McCool, R., Miller, E.: Semantic search. In: WWW 2003: Proceedings of the 12th int. conf. on World Wide Web, pp. 700–709 (2003)
Helsper, E.M., van der Gaag, L.C., Feelders, A.J., Loeffen, W.L.A., Geenen, P.L., Elbers, A.R.W.: Bringing order into bayesian-network construction. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Knowledge Capture (2005)
Hölldobler, S., Dinh Khang, T., Störr, H.-P.: A fuzzy description logic with hedges as concept modifiers. In: IPMU (2004)
Kamp, H., Partee, B.: Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57, 129–191 (1995)
Koller, D., Levy, A., Pfeffer, A.: P-classic: A tractable probabilistic description logic. In: Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on AI, pp. 390–397 (1997)
McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL web ontology language overview (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
Parry, D.: A fuzzy ontology for medical document retrieval. In: CRPIT, pp. 121–126 (2004)
Rocha, C., Schwabe, D., de Aragao, M.: A hybrid approach for searching in the semantic web. In: WWW 2004, pp. 374–383 (2004)
Rosch, E.H.: On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In: More, T.E. (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. Academic Press, New York (1973)
Rosch, E.H.: Cognitive represerntations of semantic categories. Journal of Exp. Psy. 104, 192–233 (1975)
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B.: Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structural of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7, 573–605 (1975)
Roth, E.M., Shoben, E.J.: The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 15, 346–378 (1983)
Shamsfard, M., Abdollahzadeh Barforoush, A.: Learning ontologies from natural language texts. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 60(1), 17–63 (2004)
Smith, E.E., Medin, D.L.: Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1981)
Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic. In: AAAI, pp. 594–599 (1998)
Straccia, U.: Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14, 137–166 (2001)
Tamma, V., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: An ontology model to facilitate knowledge sharing in multi-agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 17(1), 41–60 (2002)
Widyantot, D.H., Yen, J.: Using fuzzy ontology for query refinement in a personalized abstract search engine. In: Proceedings of IFSA and NAFIPS (2001)
Wiesman, F., Roos, N.: Domain independent learning of ontology mappings. In: AAMAS, pp. 846–853 (2004)
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yeung, Cm.A., Leung, Hf. (2006). Ontology with Likeliness and Typicality of Objects in Concepts. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2006. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4215. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11901181_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-47224-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47227-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)