Abstract
This paper examines some aspects of the aims and goals of the RODIN project and asks whether a successful outcome of the project will remove the need for us to worry about programming languages and the meaning of program source code. In common with some other currently ascendent approaches to software engineering, such as model-based development, RODIN is leading towards the construction of software models (in RODIN’s case precise software models) from which we may hope to generate source or even object code. So, does this remove the need for us to be concerned with the form these automatically-generated, intermediate representations take? Perhaps rather surprisingly, I conclude that the need to show an unbroken chain of confidence from requirements to object code means that programming languages and their analysis, remain an extremely important topic. I hope to show that the ability to produce better specifications and designs, as promised by approaches exemplified by RODIN, is a necessary precondition for effective high-integrity software development rather than a substitute for approaches currently in use.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amey, P.: Dear Sir, Yours Faithfully: an Everyday Story of Formality. Practical Elements of Safety. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Safety-critical Systems Symposium, Birmingham, UK, February 2004, pp. 3–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Croxford, M., Chapman, R.: Correctness by Construction: A Manifesto for High-Integrity Software. Crosstalk Journal, 5–8 (December 2005)
Barnes, J.: High Integrity Software - the SPARK Approach to Safety and Security. Addison Wesley Longman, Amsterdam (2003)
Finnie, G., et al.: SPARK 95 - The SPADE Ada 95 Kernel. Praxis High Integrity Systems
King, S., Hammond, J., Chapman, R., Pryor, A.: Proof More Cost Effective Than Testing? IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(8), 675–686 (2000)
Parnas, D.L., Madey, J.: Functional Documentation for Computer Systems. Science of Computer Programming (October 1995)
Littlewood, B., Strigini, L.: Validation of Ultrahigh Dependability for Software-Based Systems. CACM 36(11), 69–80 (1993)
Littlewood, B.: Limits to evaluation of software dependability. In: Fenton, N., Littlewood, B. (eds.) Software Reliability and Metrics (Proceedings of Seventh Annual CSR Conference, Garmisch-Partenkirchen), pp. 81–110. Elsevier, London
Butler, R.W., Finelli, G.B.: The Infeasibility of Quantifying the Reliability of Life-Critical Real-Time Software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19(1), 3–12 (1993)
Chapman, R., Amey, P.: Industrial Strength Exception Freedom. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGAda (2002)
Amey, P., Dion, B.: Combining Model-Driven Design With Diverse Formal Verification. In: ERTS 2006, Embedded Real-Time Software, Toulouse (2006)
Sixth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Contract No. 511599. The Statement of Work and other information can be found here: http://rodin.cs.ncl.ac.uk/index.htm , See also: http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp6/index_en.cfm?p=0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amey, P. (2006). Why Programming Languages Still Matter. In: Butler, M., Jones, C.B., Romanovsky, A., Troubitsyna, E. (eds) Rigorous Development of Complex Fault-Tolerant Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4157. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11916246_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11916246_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48265-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48267-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)