Skip to main content

Lower Bounds on the Deterministic and Quantum Communication Complexities of Hamming-Distance Problems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4288))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1119 Accesses

Abstract

Alice and Bob want to know if two strings of length n are almost equal. That is, do they differ on at mosta bits? Let 0≤an–1. We show that any deterministic protocol, as well as any error-free quantum protocol (C * version), for this problem requires at least n–2 bits of communication. We show the same bounds for the problem of determining if two strings differ in exactlya bits. We also prove a lower bound of n/2–1 for error-free Q * quantum protocols. Our results are obtained by employing basic tools from combinatorics and calculus to lower-bound the ranks of the appropriate matrices.

The research of the first author was supported in part by IQC University Professorship and CIAR, that of the second author in part by NSF grant CCR-01-05413, and that of the third author in part by NSF grant CCR-0208005 and NSF ITR Award CNS-0426683.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Ghaffar, K., Ababdi, A.E.: An optimal strategy for comparing file copies. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 5, 87–93 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buhrman, H., de Wolf, R.: Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials. In: Proc. of the 16th IEEE Conf. on Complexity Theory, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cormode, G., Paterson, M., Sahinalp, S., Vishkin, U.: Communication complexity of document exchange. In: Proc. of the 11th ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 197–206 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Wolf, R.: Quantum communication and complexity. Theoretical Comput. Sci. 12, 337–353 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feigenbaum, J., Ishai, Y., Malkin, T., Nissim, K., Strauss, M., Wright, R.: Secure multiparty computation of approximations. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2076, pp. 927–938. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gavinsky, D., Kempe, J., de Wolf, R.: Quantum communication cannot simulate a public coin (2004), arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0411051

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, W., Shi, Y., Zhang, S., Zhu, Y.: The communication complexity of the Hamming distance problem, arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0509181

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klauck, H.: Lower Bounds for Quantum Communication Complexity. In: Proc. IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 288–297 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krasikov, I., Litsyn, S.: On integral zeros of Krawtchouk polynomials. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A 74, 71–99 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehlhorn, K., Schmidt, E.: Las Vegas is better than determinism for VLSI and distributed systems. In: Proc. of the 14th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 330–337 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Metzner, J.: Efficient replicated remote file comparison. IEEE Transactions on Computers 40, 651–659 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Newman, I.: Private vs. common random bits in communication complexity. Inf. Process. Lett. 39, 67–71 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Orlitsky, A.: Interactive communication: balanced distributions, correlated files, and average-case complexity. In: Proc. of the 32st IEEE Symp. on Found. of Comp. Sci., pp. 228–238 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pang, K., Gamal, A.E.: Communication complexity of computing the Hamming distance. SIAM Journal of Computing 15 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raz, R.: Fourier analysis for probabilistic communication complexity. Journal of Computational Complexity 5, 205–221 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilf, H.: Generating functionology. Academic Press, London (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yao, A.: On the power of quantum fingerprinting. In: Proc. of the 35th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 77–81 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ambainis, A., Gasarch, W., Srinivasan, A., Utis, A. (2006). Lower Bounds on the Deterministic and Quantum Communication Complexities of Hamming-Distance Problems. In: Asano, T. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4288. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11940128_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11940128_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49694-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49696-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics