Skip to main content

Automating Belief Revision for AgentSpeak

  • Conference paper
Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies IV (DALT 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4327))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The AgentSpeak agent-oriented programming language has recently been extended with various new features, such as speech-act based communication, internal belief additions, and support for reasoning with ontological knowledge, which imply the need for belief revision within an AgentSpeak agent. In this paper, we show how a polynomial-time belief-revision algorithm can be incorporated into the Jason AgentSpeak interpreter by making use of Jason’s language constructs and customisation features. This is one of the first attempts to include automatic belief revision within an interpreter for a practical agent programming language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet functions for contraction and revision. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alechina, N., Jago, M., Logan, B.: Resource-bounded belief revision and contraction. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3904, pp. 141–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ancona, D., Mascardi, V., Hübner, J.F., Bordini, R.H.: Coo-AgentSpeak: Cooperation in AgentSpeak through plan exchange. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L., Tambe, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2004), pp. 698–705. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): Handbook of Description Logics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.): Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Platforms and Applications. Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations, vol. 15. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., et al.: Jason: A Java-based Agentspeak interpreter used with SACI for multi-agent distribution over the net, manual, release version 0.7 edn. (August 2005), http://jason.sourceforge.net/

  7. Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Vieira, R.: Jason and the Golden Fleece of agent-oriented programming. In: Bordini et al. (eds.) [5], ch. 1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bordini, R.H., Moreira, Á.F.: Proving BDI properties of agent-oriented programming languages: The asymmetry thesis principles in AgentSpeak(L). Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 42(1–3), 197–226 (2004); (Special Issue on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, H., Finin, T., Joshi, A.: The SOUPA Ontology for Pervasive Computing. In: Tamma, V., et al. (eds.) Ontologies for Agents: Theory and Experiences, pp. 233–258, BirkHauser (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, K.L., McCabe, F.G.: Ontology schema for an agent belief store. IJCIS (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dastani, M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Programming multi-agent systems in 3APL. In: Bordini et al. [5], ch. 2

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Bruijn, J., Polleres, A., Fensel, D.: Owl lite. working draft, WSML delieverable D20 v0.1, WSML (July 18, 2004), http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d20/v0.1/20040629/

  13. Gärdenfors, P.: Conditionals and changes of belief. In: Niiniluoto, I., Tuomela, R. (eds.) The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, pp. 381–404. North Holland, Amsterdam (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: A proposal for an OWL rules language. In: Feldman, S.I., Uretsky, M., Najork, M., Wills, C.E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2004, pp. 723–731. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Makinson, D.: How to give it up: A survey of some formal aspects of the logic of theory change. Synthese 62, 347–363 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Moreira, Á.F., Vieira, R., Bordini, R.H.: Extending the operational semantics of a BDI agent-oriented programming language for introducing speech-act based communication. In: Leite, J., Omicini, A., Sterling, L., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2990, pp. 135–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreira, Á.F., Vieira, R., Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.: Agent-oriented programming with underlying ontological reasoning. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3904, pp. 155–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Nebel, B.: A knowledge level analysis of belief revision. In: Brachman, R., Levesque, H.J., Reiter, R. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the First International Conference, San Mateo, pp. 301–311. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nebel, B.: Syntax-based approaches to belief revision. In: Gärdenfors, P. (ed.) Belief Revision, vol. 29, pp. 52–88. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Nebel, B.: Base revision operations and schemes: Representation, semantics and complexity. In: Cohn, A.G. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1994), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 341–345. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rao, A.S.: AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1038, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Rott, H.: Just Because: Taking belief bases seriously. In: Buss, S.R., Hájaek, P., Pudlák, P. (eds.) Logic Colloquium 1998—Proceedings of the 1998 ASL European Summer Meeting. Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 13, pp. 387–408. Association for Symbolic Logic (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van Eijk, R.M., de Boer, F.S., van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Information-passing and belief revision in multi-agent systems. In: Rao, A.S., Singh, M.P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ATAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1555, pp. 29–45. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams, M.-A.: Two operators for theory base change. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 259–265. World Scientific, Singapore (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Williams, M.-A.: Iterated theory base change: A computational model. In: Proceedings of Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), San Mateo, pp. 1541–1549. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alechina, N., Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Jago, M., Logan, B. (2006). Automating Belief Revision for AgentSpeak. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U. (eds) Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies IV. DALT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11961536_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11961536_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68959-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68961-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics