Skip to main content

Qualitative Preference Modelling in Constraint Satisfaction

  • Chapter
Decision Theory and Multi-Agent Planning

Abstract

The paper addresses the problem of finding an appropriate formalism for the representation of preferences expressed on an n-dimensional space of attributes and on different layers: generic, contextual and structural preferences.

The paper first introduces a general framework for preference modelling and then specialises it for the multi-layer case. It then shows that in the case we privilege computational efficiency an appropriate formalism can be the CP-nets one. More precisely we show how contextual and structural preferences can be seen as different types of constraint satisfaction problems to which apply some Ceteris-Paribus preferential reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Boutilier. Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR’94, pages 75–86. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Boutilier, R. Brafman, H. Hoos, and D. Poole. Reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI’99, pages 71–80. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bouyssou. Outranking relations: do they have special properties? Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 5:99–111, 1996.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Bouyssou, T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, P. Perny, A. Tsoukiàs, and P. Vincke. Evaluation and decision models: a critical perspective. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Bouyssou, T. Marchant, M. Pirlot, P. Perny, A. Tsoukiàs, and P. Vincke. Evaluation and decision models: stepping stones for the analyst. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bouyssou and M. Pirlot. Conjoint measurement tools for MCDM. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pages 73–132. Springer Verlag, Boston, Dordrecht, London, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Brafman and C. Domshlak. Introducing variable importance tradeoffs into CP-Nets. In Proceedings of UAI-2002, pages 69–76, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Brafman and M. Tennenholtz. On the foundations of qualitative decision theory. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI96, pages 1291–1296. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Brafman and M. Tennenholtz. Modeling agents as qualitative decision makers. Artificial Intelligence, 94:217–268, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Doyle. Prospects for preferences. Computational Intelligence, 20:111136, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Doyle and M. Wellman. Representing preferences as ceteris paribus comparatives. In Decision-Theoretic Planning: Papers from the 1994 Spring AAAI Symposium, pages 69–75. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Dubois, H. Fargier, P. Perny, and H. Prade. Qualitative decision theory: from Savage’s axioms to non-monotonic reasoning. Journal of the ACM, 49:455–495, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Fishburn. Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York, 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Fishburn. Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Management Science, 20:1442–1471, 1974.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Fishburn. Preference structures and their numerical representations. Theoretical Computer Science, 217(2):359–383, April 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. S. French. Decision theory — An introduction to the mathematics of rationality. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. J. Wiley, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Krantz, R. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky. Foundations of measurement, volume 1: Additive and polynomial representations. Academic Press, New York, 1971.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Mittal and B. Falkenhainer. Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings of AAAI-1990, pages 25–32, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Öztürk, A. Tsoukiàs, and Ph. Vincke. Preference modelling. In M. Ehrgott, S. Greco, and J. Figueira, editors, State of the Art in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pages 27–72. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Roubens and P. Vincke. Preference Modeling. LNEMS 250, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. J. Wiley, New York, 1954. second revised edition, 1972.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Tsoukiàs. On the concept of decision aiding process. Annals of Operations Research. To appear; appeared previously as DIMACS 2003-38 technical report, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  24. P. Vincke. Multicriteria Decision-Aid. J. Wiley, New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Wakker. Additive representations of preferences — A new foundation of decision analysis. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. N. Wilson. Consistency and constrained optimisation for conditional preferences. In Proceedings of ECAI-04, pages 888–894, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. Wilson. Extending CP-nets with stronger conditional preference statements. In Proceedings of AAAI-04, pages 735–741, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 CISM, Udine

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P., Tsoukiàs, A. (2006). Qualitative Preference Modelling in Constraint Satisfaction. In: Della Riccia, G., Dubois, D., Kruse, R., Lenz, HJ. (eds) Decision Theory and Multi-Agent Planning. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 482. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-38167-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-38167-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-31787-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-38167-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics