Skip to main content

A note on resolution: How to get rid of factoring without loosing completeness

  • Friday Morning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 87))

Abstract

It is often useful to simplify the resolution inference system by elimination of factoring. Factoring, however, cannot be ignored entirely without loosing completeness. This paper studies to what extent factoring is necessary to preserve it. We can show that it is sufficient to factorize only one of the two parent clauses of a resolvent. We apply this basic result to a class of well known refinements and describe for each rule which clause (the so called "selected parent") has at most to be factored.

We try to achieve the results in a transparent manner using only elementary notions of resolution theory, so that this note should be readable without detailed knowledge of resolution strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Bergmann und H. Noll: Mathematische Logik mit Informatik-Anwendungen. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1977

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.L. Chang and R.C.T. Lee: Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. New York, London: Academic Press 1973

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Green: Applications of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving. Proceedings International Joint Conference. Artificial Intelligence, 219–239 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.J. Hayes: An Abstract Lifting Theorem. University of Essex. Memo CSM-11, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  5. L.J. Henschen: Unit Refutations and Horn Sets. J. ACM 21, 590–605 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Kowalski: Studies in Completeness and Efficiency of Theorem Proving by Resolution. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Kowalski: Predicate Logic as Programming Language. Proceedings of the IFIP-Congress, Stockholm, 569–574 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kowalski and D.G. Kühner: Linear Resolution with Selection Function. Artificial Intelligence 2, 221–260 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Luckham: Refinement Theorems in Resolution Theory. Proceedings IRIA Symposium on Automatic Demonstration. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 163–190 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Noll: Eine konstruktive Formulierung des Lifting-Theorems unter expliziter Angabe der liftenden Substitutionen und eine Anwendung auf Faktorisierungs-Einschränkungen. Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin, Fachbereich 20 — Informatik, 1976 This thesis contains a weaker version of the results presented in this paper.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Robinson: A Machine-Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle. J. ACM 12, 23–41 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Wolfgang Bibel Robert Kowalski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Noll, H. (1980). A note on resolution: How to get rid of factoring without loosing completeness. In: Bibel, W., Kowalski, R. (eds) 5th Conference on Automated Deduction Les Arcs, France, July 8–11, 1980. CADE 1980. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 87. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10009-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10009-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10009-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38140-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics