Skip to main content

Proving the correctness of implementations of shared data abstractions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Symposium on Programming (Programming 1982)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 137))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

A method is presented for proving the correctness of an implementation of shared abstract data types. The proposed correctness proof method is an extension of Hoare's method developed for proving the correctness of an implementation of abstract data types specified in a sequential programming environment. An example is given to illustrate the proposed proof method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E.W. Dijkstra "Guarded Commands, Nondeterminacy and Formal Derivation of Programs" Comm. of the ACM 18, 8, pp. 453–457 /1975/

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.A.R. Hoare Proofs of Correctness of Data Representations,Acta Informatica I. pp. 271–281. /1972/

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.A.R. Hoare Monitors: an Operating System Structuring Concept Comm. of the ACM 17. 10, pp. 549–556 /October 1974/

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.H. Howard Proving Monitors Comm.of the ACM 19,5, pp. 273–279 /1976/

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Kozma A Transformation of Strongly Correct Concurrent Programs In: Proceedings of Third Hungarian Computer Science Conference, pp. 157–170 /1981/

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Lamport Proving the Correctness of Multiprocess Programs EIII Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-3, No. 2., /March 1977/

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. van Lamsweerde and M. Sintzoff Formal Derivation of Strongly Correct Acta Informatica 12, pp. 1–31. /1979/

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.S. Laventhal Synthesis of synchronization code for data abstracti abstractions M.I.T. Laboratory for Computer Science /1978/

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Owicki An axiomatic proof technique for parallel programs II. shared data abstractions Stanford University /1976/

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Owicki and D. Gries An Axiomatic Proof Technique for Parallel Programs I. Acta Informatica 6, pp. 319–340 /1976/

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Owicki Verifying Concurrent Programs with Shared Data Classes In: Formal Description of Programming Concepts, E.J. Neuhold /e.d./ North-Holland Publishing Company /1978/

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Shaw, W.A. Wulf, R.L. London Abstraction and Verification in Alphard: Defining and Specifiying Iteration and Generators Comm. of the ACM, 20, 8. pp. 353–364 /Aug. 1977/

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Spitzen and B. Wegbreit The Verification and Synthesis of Data Structures Acta Informatica 4. pp. 127–144 /1975/

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Varga Specification of Reliable Software Operációs Rendszerek Téli Iskola MTA Számitástechnikai és Automatizálási Kutató Intézet Tanulmányok 113/1980 309–325

    Google Scholar 

  15. W. Wulf, R. London and M. Shaw "An Introduction to the Construction and Verification of Alphard Programs" IEEE Transactions of Software Eng. SE-2, pp. 253–264 /1976/

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.A. Wulf, R.L. London and M. Shaw Abstraction and Verification in Alphard: A Symbol Table Example In. Proceedings of IFIP TC2 Working Conference, Novosibirsk /1977/

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mariangiola Dezani-Ciancaglini Ugo Montanari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kozma, L. (1982). Proving the correctness of implementations of shared data abstractions. In: Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Montanari, U. (eds) International Symposium on Programming. Programming 1982. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-11494-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-11494-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-11494-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39184-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics