Skip to main content

Some contributions to the logical analysis of circumscription

  • Nondassical Deducation
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
8th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE 1986)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 230))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

After sketching the first and second order version of McCarthy's predicate circumscription, we introduce the notion of positive disjunctive circumscription as an approach to (this form of) non-monotonic reasoning which guarantees consistency. We define the positive disjunctive extension PD(T) of a first order theory T and show that it is conservative over T. Then we turn to sets defined by positive disjunctive circumscription and state a boundedness theorem concerning their stages. The last considerations refer to generalizations of positive disjunctive circumscription. We discuss the inclusion of (intersective) priority relations and extensions by iteration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buchholz, W., Feferman, S., Pohlers, W. and Sieg, W. Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis: Recent Proof-Theoretical Studies. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 897, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang C.L. and Lee R.C.T. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, K. Negation as failure. In: Logic and Databases. Gallaire, H. and Minker, J. (eds.). Plenum Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, M. The mathematics of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Etherington, D.W., Mercer, R.E. and Reiter, R. On the adequacy of predicate circumscription for closed-world reasoning. Computational Intelligence 1 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feferman, S. Monotone inductive definitions. In: The L.E.J. Brouwer Centenary Symposion. Troelstra, A.S. and van Dalen, D. (eds.). North Holland, Amsterdam (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaeger, G. The proof-theoretic analysis of positive disjunctive circumscription. Preprint, Zuerich (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lifschitz, V. Computing circumscription. Proceedings IJCAI-85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lifschitz, V. Closed world data bases and circumscription. Preprint 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lifschitz, V. On the satisfiability of circumscription. Preprint 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy, C. Circumscription — a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy, C. Applications of circumscription to formalizing common sense knowledge. AAAI Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. McDermott, D. and Doyle, J. Non-monotonic logic I. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, R.C. Semantical considerations on nonmonotonic logic. Artificial Intelligence 25 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moschovakis, Y.N. Elementary Induction on Abstract Structures. North Holland, Amsterdam (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parikh, R. Logic of knowledge, games and dynamic logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 181. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reiter, R. On closed world data bases. In: Logic and Databases. Gallaire, H. and Minker J. (eds.). Plenum Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reiter, R. Circumscription implies predicate completion (sometimes). Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-82.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shoenfield, J.R. Mathematical Logic. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jörg H. Siekmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jaeger, G. (1986). Some contributions to the logical analysis of circumscription. In: Siekmann, J.H. (eds) 8th International Conference on Automated Deduction. CADE 1986. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 230. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-16780-3_88

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-16780-3_88

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16780-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39861-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics