Skip to main content

Design of Hybrid Learning Control for Flexible Manipulators: a Multi-objective Optimisation Approach

  • Conference paper
Climbing and Walking Robots
  • 1495 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents investigations at development of a design approach of a hybrid iterative learning control scheme for flexible robot manipulators using the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approach. A single-link flexible manipulator system is considered in this work. This is a high order, nonlinear and single-input multi-output system with infinite number of modes each with associated damping ratios. Moreover, rise time, overshoot, settling time and end-point vibration are always in conflict in the flexible manipulator since the faster the motion, the larger the level of vibration. A collocated proportional-derivative (PD) controller utilising hub-angle and hub-velocity feedback is developed to control rigid-body motion of the system. This is then extended to incorporate iterative learning control with acceleration feedback to reduce the end-point acceleration of the system. The system performance largely depends on suitable selection of controller parameters. Single objective optimisation techniques can hardly provide good solution in such cases. Multi-objective GAs with fitness sharing technique is used to find optimal set of solutions for iterative learning control parameters, which trade off between these conflicting objectives. The performance of the hybrid learning control scheme is assessed in terms of time-domain specifications and level of vibration reduction at resonance modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azad, A. K. M. (1994). Analysis and design of control mechanism for flexible manipulator systems, PhD thesis, Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benosman, M. and Vey, L. (2004). Control of flexible manipulators: A survey, Robotica, Vol. 22, pp. 535–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cannon, R. H. and Schmitz, E. (1984). Initial Experiments on the End-Point Control of a Flexible One-Link Robot, The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb K. (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. New York; Chichester: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fonseca, C. M. and Fleming, P. J. (1993). Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization, Genetic Algoritms: Proceeding of the Fifth International Conference, San Mateo, CA, pp. 416–423.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fonseca, C. M. and Fleming, P. J. (1995). An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization, Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fonseca, C. M., and Fleming, P. J. (1998). Multiobjective optimization and multiple constraint handling with evolutionary algorithms-part I: A unified formulation, The IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg D. E, Richardson J. (1987). Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization, In J. Grefenstette, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimisation and machine learning, Addison Wesley Longman, Publishing Co. Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tokhi, M. O., Alam, M. S., Zain M. Z. Md. and Aldebrez, F. M. (2005). Adaptive command shaping using genetic algorithms for vibration control of a single link flexible manipulator, Proceedings of 12 th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Lisbon, Portugal, 11–14 July.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zain M. Z. Md, Tokhi M. O. and Alam M. S. (2005). Robustness of hybrid learning acceleration feedback control scheme in flexible manipulators, The Fourth World Enformatica Conference, Istanbul (Turkey) 24–26 June.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alam, M.S., Zain, M.Z.M., Tokhi, M.O., Aldebrez, F. (2006). Design of Hybrid Learning Control for Flexible Manipulators: a Multi-objective Optimisation Approach. In: Tokhi, M.O., Virk, G.S., Hossain, M.A. (eds) Climbing and Walking Robots. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26415-9_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26415-9_72

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26413-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26415-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics