Skip to main content

An Efficient Branch and Bound Procedure for Restricted Principal Components Analysis

  • Chapter
Data Analysis and Decision Support

Abstract

Principal components analysis (PCA) is one of the foremost multivariate methods utilized in social science research for data reduction, latent variable modeling, multicollinearity resolution, etc. However, while its optimal properties make PCA solutions unique, interpreting the results of such analyses can be problematic. A plethora of rotation methods are available for such interpretive uses, but there is no theory as to which rotation method should be applied in any given social science problem. In addition, different rotational procedures typically render different interpretive results. We present restricted principal components analysis (RPCA) as introduced initially by Hausman (1982). RPCA attempts to optimally derive latent components whose coefficients are integer constrained (e.g.: {−1,0,1}, {0,1}, etc). This constraint results in solutions which are sequentially optimal, with no need for rotation. In addition, the RPCA procedure can enhance data reduction efforts since fewer raw variables define each derived component. Unfortunately, the integer programming solution proposed by Hausman can take far to long to solve even medium-sized problems. We augment his algorithm with two efficient modifications for extracting these constrained components. With such modifications, we are able to accommodate substantially larger RPCA problems. A Marketing application to luxury automobile preference analysis is also provided where traditional PCA and RPCA results are more formally compared and contrasted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • DESARBO, W.S., HAUSMAN, R.E., LIN, S., and THOMPSON, W. (1982): Constrained canonical correlation. Psychometrika, 47, 489–516.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • DESARBO, W.S. and JEDIDI, K. (1995): The spatial representation of heterogeneous consideration sets. Marketing Science, 14, 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAUSER, J.R. and KOPPELMAN, F.S. (1979): Alternative perceptual mapping techniques: Relative accuracy and usefulness. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAUSMAN, R. (1982): Constrained multivariate analysis. In H. Zanakis and J.S. Rustagi (Eds.): TIMS’/Studies in the management sciences. Vol. 19, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLBROOK, M.B. and HUBER, J. (1979): Separating perceptual dimensions from affective overtones: An application to consumer aesthetics. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 272–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JOLLIFFE, I.T. (1987): Rotation of principal components: Some comments. Journal of Climatology, 7, 507–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • JOLLIFFE, I.T. (2002): Principal component analysis (2nd Edition). Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • OKAMATO, M. (1969): Optimality of principal components. In P.R. Kishnaiah (Ed.): Multivariate Analysis II. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAO, C. R. (1964): The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya, A 26, 329–359.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • RENCHER, A.C. (1995): Methods of multivariate analysis. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • RICHMAN, M.B. (1986): Rotation of principal components. Journal of Climatology, 6, 293–335.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DeSarbo, W.S., Hausman, R.E. (2005). An Efficient Branch and Bound Procedure for Restricted Principal Components Analysis. In: Baier, D., Decker, R., Schmidt-Thieme, L. (eds) Data Analysis and Decision Support. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28397-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics