Skip to main content

Semantische Beschreibung von Web Services

  • Chapter
Semantic Web

Part of the book series: X.media.press ((XMEDIAP))

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden Anwendungsgebiete und Ansätze für die semantische Beschreibung von Web Services behandelt. Bestehende Web Service Technologien leisten einen entscheidenden Beitrag zur Entwicklung verteilter Anwendungen dadurch, dass weithin akzeptierte Standards vorliegen, die die Kommunikation zwischen Anwendungen bestimmen und womit deren Kombination zu komplexeren Einheiten ermöglicht wird. Automatisierte Mechanismen zum Auffinden geeigneter Web Services und deren Komposition dagegen werden von bestehenden Technologien in vergleichsweise geringem Maß unterstützt. Ähnlich wie bei der Annotation statischer Daten im „Semantic Web“ setzen Forschung und Industrie große Hoffnungen in die semantische Beschreibung von Web Services zur weitgehenden Automatisierung dieser Aufgaben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. KIF. knowledge interchange format: Draft proposed american national standard (dpANS). Technical Report NCITS.T2/98-004, ANSI KIF Ad Hoc Group, 1998. http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/dpans.html.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meta-object facility. Technical report, The Object Management Group, 2004. http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/mof.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Akkiraju, J. Farrell, J. Miller, M. Nagarajan, M. T. Schmidt, A. Sheth, and K. Verma. Web Service Semantics-WSDL-S. W3C Member Submission, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2005/10/, Nov. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Alonso, F. Casati, H. Kuno, and V. Machiraju. Web Services: Concepts, Architectures and Applications. Springer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Anderson, J. Bohren, T. Boubez, M. Chanliau, G. Della-Libera, B. Dixon, P. Garg, M. Gudgin, P. Hallam-Baker, M. Hondo, C. Kaler, H. Lockhart, R. Martherus, H. Maruyama, A. Nadalin, N. Nagaratnam, A. Nash, R. Philpott, D. Platt, H. Prafullchandra, M. Sahu, J. Shewchuk, D. Simon, D. Srinivas, E. Waingold, D. Waite, D. Walter, and R. Zolfonoon. Web Services Trust Language (WS-Trust). Technical report, Actional, BEA, Computer Associates, IBM, Layer 7, Microsoft, Oblix, Open Network, Ping Identity, Reactivity, RSA Security, Verisign, February 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Andrews, F. Curbera, H. Dholakia, Y. Goland, J. Klein, F. Leymann, K. Liu, D. Roller, D. Smith, S. Thatte, I. Trickovic, and S. Weerawarana. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services version 1.1. Specification, May 2003. http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-bpel/.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. Patel-Schneider, (eds.) The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Baida, J. Gordijn, B. Omelayenko, and H. Akkermans. A Shared Service Terminology for Online Service Provisioning. In ICEC04, Delft, Netherlands, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Bajaj, D. Box, D. Chappell, F. Curbera, G. Daniels, P. Hallam-Baker, M. Hondo, C. Kaler, D. Langworthy, A. Malhotra, A. Nadalin, N. Nagaratnam, M. Nottingham, H. Prafullchandra, C. von Riegen, J. Schlimmer, C. Sharp, and J. Shewchuk. Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy). Technical report, BEA, IBM, Microsoft, SAP, Sonic Software, Verisign, Sept. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Bajaj, D. Box, D. Chappell, F. Curbera, G. Daniels, P. Hallam-Baker, M. Hondo, C. Kaler, A. Malhotra, H. Maruyama, A. Nadalin, M. Nottingham, D. Orchard, H. Prafullchandra, C. von Riegen, J. Schlimmer, C. Sharp, and J. Shewchuk. Web Services Policy Attachment (WS-PolicyAttachment). Technical report, BEA, IBM, Microsoft, SAP, Sonic Software, Verisign, Sept. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Battle, A. Bernstein, H. Boley, B. Grosof, M. Gruninger, R. Hull, M. Kifer, D. Martin, D. L. McGuinness, S. McIlraith, G. Newton, D. De Roure, M. Skall, J. Su, S. Tabet, and H. Yoshida. Semantic web services framework (SWSF). W3C Member Submission, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2005/07/, May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Bellwood, L. Cl’ement, D. Ehnebuske, A. Hately, Maryann Hondo, Y.L. Husband, K. Januszewski, S. Lee, B. McKee, J. Munter, and C. von Riegen. UDDI version 3.0. http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm, July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. D. Birell and B. J. Nelson. Implementing remote procedure calls. ACM Transactions of Computer Systems, 1(2):39–59, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Christensen, F. Curbera, G. Meredith, and S. Weerawarana. Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl, March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Cimpian and A. Mocan. Wsmx process mediation based on choreographies. In 1st Int’l Workshop on Web Service Choreography and Orchestration for Business Process Management (BPM 2005), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. de Bruijn, C. Bussler, J. Domingue, D. Fensel, M. Hepp, U. Keller, M. Kifer, B. König-Ries, J. Kopecky, R. Lara, H. Lausen, E. Oren, A. Polleres, D. Roman, J. Scicluna, and M. Stollberg. Web service modeling ontology (WSMO). W3C Member Submission, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2005/06/, April 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Elenius, G. Denker, D. Martin, F. Gilham, J. Khouri, S. Sadaati, and R. Senanayake. The OWL-S editor — a development tool for semantic web services. In Proc. of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2005), Heraklion, Crete, May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Esplugas-Cuadrado. B2B demosntrator description. Technical report, Semantic Web Enabled Web Services, Sept. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Gerlernter. Generative communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Prog. Lang. and Systems (TOPLAS), 1(7):80–112, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Horrocks, P.F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean. SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL-20040521/, May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. U. Keller, R. Lara, H. Lausen, A. Polleres, and D. Fensel. Automatic location of services. In Proc. of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2005), Heraklion, Crete, May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Kerrigan. Web service selection mechanisms in the web service execution environment (WSMX). In Semantic-Based Resource Discovery, Retrieval and Composition (RDRC) Track of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’06), April 2006. Accepted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Kifer, R. Lara, A. Polleres, C. Zhao, U. Keller, H. Lausen, and D. Fensel. A logical framework for web service discovery. In ISWC 2004 Workshop on Semantic Web Services: Preparing to Meet the World of Business Applications, Hiroshima, Japan, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Kifer, G. Lausen, and J. Wu. Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. JACM, 42(4):741–843, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Krummenacher, M. Hepp, A. Polleres, C. Bussler, and D. Fensel. WWW or What is Wrong with Web services. In Proc. of the 3rd European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS 2005), Växjö, Sweden, Nov. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.W. Lloyd. Foundations of Logic Programming (2nd Edition). Springer, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Daniel J. Mandell and Sheila A. McIlraith. Adapting bpel4ws for the semantic web: The bottom-up approach to web service interoperation. In Proc. of the 2nd Int’l Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003), pages 227–241, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  28. David Martin, Mark Burstein, Jerry Hobbs, Ora Lassila, Drew McDermott, Sheila McIlraith, Srini Narayanan, Massimo Paolucci, Bijan Parsia, Terry Payne, Evren Sirin, Naveen Srinivasan, and Katia Sycara. OWL-S: Semantic markup for web services. W3C Member Submission, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/07/, Nov. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. McDermott. DRS: A set of conventions for representing logical languages in RDF. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1B/DRSguide.pdf, January 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Motta, J. Domingue, L. Cabral, and M. Gaspari. Irs-ii: A framework and infrastructure for semantic web services. In 2nd Int’l Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003). Springer Verlag, October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Nadalin, C. Kaler, P. Hallam-Baker, and R. Monzillo (eds.). Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.0 (WS-Security 2004). Technical report, OASIS, March 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Narayanan and S. McIlraith. Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services. In Proc. of the 11th Int’l World Wide Web Conference (WWW2002), Honolulu, Hawaii, May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. Olmedilla, R. Lara, A. Polleres, and H. Lausen. Trust negotiation for semantic web services. In 1st Int’l Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC 2004), in conjunction with the 2004 IEEE Int’l Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2004), San Diego, California, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. Payne, and K. Sycara. Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In I. Horrocks and J. Handler, editors, 1st Int. Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pages 333–347. Springer Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A. Patil, S. Oundhakar, A. Sheth, and K. Verma. METEOR-S Web service Annotation Framework. In Proc. of the 13th Int’l World Wide Web Conference (WWW2004), pages 553–562, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  36. C. Preist. A conceptual architecture for semantic web services. In Proc. of the Int’l Semantic Web Conference 2004 (ISWC 2004), Nov. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  37. F. Scharffe and J. de Bruijn. A language to specify mappings between ontologies. In IEEE SITIS’05, Yaound’e, Cameroon, Nov. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Sirin and B. Parsia. The owl-s java api. Nov. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  39. E. Sirin, B. Parsia, D. Wu, J. Hendler, and D. Nau. HTN planning for web service composition using SHOP2. 1(4):377–396, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. N. Srinivasan, M. Paolucci, and K. Sycara. Adding OWL-S to UDDI, implementation and throughput. In 1st Int’l Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC 2004), July 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  41. K. Verma, K. Sivashanmugam, A. Sheth, A. Patil, S. Oundhakar, and J. Miller. METEOR-S WSDI: A Scalable Infrastructure of Registries for Semantic Publication and Discovery of Web Services. Journal of Information Technology and Management, Special Issue on Universal Global Integration, 6(1):17–39, 2005. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. W3C. SOAP version 1.2 part 0: Primer. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part0-20030624/, June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polleres, A., Lausen, H., Lara, R. (2006). Semantische Beschreibung von Web Services. In: Pellegrini, T., Blumauer, A. (eds) Semantic Web. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29325-6_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics