Skip to main content

Constrained Optimization by ε Constrained Particle Swarm Optimizer with ε-level Control

  • Conference paper
Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 29))

Summary

In this study, ε constrained particle swarm optimizer εPSO, which is the combination of the ε constrained method and particle swarm optimization, is proposed to solve constrained optimization problems. The ε constrained methods can convert algorithms for unconstrained problems to algorithms for constrained problems using the ε level comparison, which compares the search points based on the constraint violation of them. In the ε PSO, the agents who satisfy the constraints move to optimize the objective function and the agents who don’t satisfy the constraints move to satisfy the constraints. Also, the way of controlling ε-level is given to solve problems with equality constraints. The effectiveness of the ε PSO is shown by comparing the ε PSO with GENOCOP5.0 on some nonlinear constrained problems with equality constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Z. Michalewicz and G. Nazhiyath, GENOCOP III: A Co-evolutionary Algorithm for Numerical Optimization Problems with Nonlinear Constraints, Proc. of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, pp.647–651, Perth, Australia, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Coath and S.K. Halgamuge, A comparison of constraint-handling methods for the application of particle swarm optimization to constrained nonlinear optimization problems, Proc. of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2003, Canberra, Australia, pp.2419–2425, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. X. Hu and R.C. Eberhart, Solving constrained nonlinear optimization problems with particle swarm optimization, Proc. of the Sixth World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 2002, Orlando, USA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.E. Parsopoulos and M.N. Vrahatis, Particle swarm optimization method for constrained optimization problems, in Intelligent Technologies — Theory and Application: New Trends in Intelligent Technologies, eds. P. Sincak, J. Vascak et al., pp.214–220, IOS Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Takahama and S. Sakai, Tuning Fuzzy Control Rules by the α Constrained Method Which Solves Constrained Nonlinear Optimization Problems, IEICE Trans. on Information and Systems, vol. J82-A, no. 5, pp.658–668, May 1999, in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Takahama and S. Sakai, Tuning Fuzzy Control Rules by the α Constrained Method Which Solves Constrained Nonlinear Optimization Problems, Electronics and Communications in Japan, vol. 83, no. 9, pp.1–12, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Deb, An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 186, no. 2/4, pp.311–338, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. T.P. Runarsson and X. Yao, Stochastic ranking for constrained evolutionary optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp.284–294, Sept. 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Camponogara and S.N. Talukdar, A genetic algorithm for constrained and multiobjective optimization, 3rd Nordic Workshop on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, Vaasa, Finland, pp.49–62, Aug. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.D. Surry and N.J. Radcliffe, The COMOGA method: Constrained optimisation by multiobjective genetic algorithms, Control and Cybernetics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp.391–412, 1997.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Ray, K. Liew and P. Saini, An intelligent information sharing strategy within a swarm for unconstrained and constrained optimization problems, Soft Computing — A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.38–44, Feb. 2002.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Takahama and S. Sakai. Learning Fuzzy Control Rules by α-Constrained Simplex Method, IEICE Trans. on Information and Systems, vol. J83-D-I, no. 7, pp.770–779, July 2000, in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Takahama and S. Sakai, Learning Fuzzy Control Rules by α-Constrained Simplex Method, System and Computers in Japan, vol. 34, no. 6, pp.80–90, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Takahama and S. Sakai. Constrained Optimization by α Constrained Genetic Algorithm (αGA), IEICE Trans. on Information and Systems, vol. J86-D-I, no. 4, pp.198–207, Apr. 2003, in Japanese.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Takahama and S. Sakai, Constrained Optimization by α Constrained Genetic Algorithm (α GA), Systems and Computers in Japan, vol. 35, no. 5, pp.11–22, May 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Takahama and S. Sakai, Constrained Optimization by Combining the α Constrained Method with Particle Swarm Optimization, Proc. of Joint 2nd International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems and 5th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Takahama and S. Sakai, Constrained Optimization by the α Constrained Particle Swarm Optimizer, Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Koziel and Z. Michalewicz, Evolutionary Algorithms, Homomorphous Mappings, and Constrained Parameter Optimization, Evolutionary Computation, vol. 7, no. 1, pp.19–44, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Michalewicz. Genetic Algorithms, Numerical Optimization and Constraints, Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp.151–158, Pittsburgh, July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Z. Michalewicz, Genetic algorithm + data structures = evolution programs 3rd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle Swarm Optimization, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. IV, pp.1942–1948, Perth, Australia, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Kennedy and R.C. Eberhart, Swarm Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Shi and R. Eberhart, A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp.69–73, Anchorage, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Shi, http://www.engr.iupui.edu/~eberhart/web/PSObook.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Takahama, T., Sakai, S. (2005). Constrained Optimization by ε Constrained Particle Swarm Optimizer with ε-level Control. In: Abraham, A., Dote, Y., Furuhashi, T., Köppen, M., Ohuchi, A., Ohsawa, Y. (eds) Soft Computing as Transdisciplinary Science and Technology. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 29. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32391-0_105

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32391-0_105

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25055-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32391-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics