Skip to main content

Tool Support for Visualizing CSP in UML

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods and Software Engineering (ICFEM 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2495))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an approach to translating UML to CSP that allows one to utilize both UML and CSP in a system design. To do so, we divide the visualization task based on three aspects of CSP: (i) the dynamics behavior, (ii) the static architecture, and (iii) the refinement assertions. In doing so we are able to visualize CSP via UML in a hierarchical manner which enhances understanding in the design process. In a way, we also provide a formal verification for the UML diagrams using CSP, since there are model checkers like FDR available. We have adopted the use of UML state diagram and class diagram for our work. In addition, we have outlined a prototyped tool that translates these diagrams to CSP that could be model-checked in FDR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.W. Roscoe. The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice Hall. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. David Harel and Michal Politi. Modeling Reactive Systems with State diagrams. Computing McGraw-Hill. 1988. ISBN 0-07-026205-5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specifictaion, Version 1.3 June 1999. http://www.rational.com/uml/resources/documentation/post.pdf

  4. Mark Priestly. Practical Object_Oriented Design with UML. MacGraw Hill. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Formal Systems Website. http://www.formal.demon.co.uk/FDR2.html

  6. Christie Bolton and Jim Davies. Activity Graphs and Processes. Integrated Formal Methods, 2 nd International Conference, IFM 2000 Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, Nov 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geetha Abeysinghe, Keith Phalp. Combining Process Modeling Methods. Information and Software Technology 39 (1997) 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gregor Engels, Reiko Heckel and Jochen Malte Kuster. Rule-based Specification of Behavioral Consistency based on the UML Meta-Model. 4 th International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language:UML 2001. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin Fowler and Kendall Scott. UML Distilled. Applying The Standard Object Modeling Language. Addison-Wesley. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ng, M.Y., Butler, M. (2002). Tool Support for Visualizing CSP in UML. In: George, C., Miao, H. (eds) Formal Methods and Software Engineering. ICFEM 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2495. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36103-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36103-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00029-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36103-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics