Abstract
The paper proposes an epistemological analysis of the dichotomy discovery/invention. In particular, we argue in favor of the idea that science does not discover facts by induction but rather invents theories that are then checked against experience.
The view of science as a cumulative process was described by Thomas Kuhn [6] as opposed to his view in which science is a process composed by irreconcilable steps.
In Logic der Forschung [12] Popper maintains that scientists invent—rather than discover—laws and then they check them against experience. In this respect, the title The logic of scientific discovery of the English translation is particularly misleading and seems to suggest the opposite idea:indeed the German forschung means literally research rather than discovery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Bacon. Novum Organum. 1610. Available in: The works, B. Montague (ed.), Parry & MacMillan, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1854.
Pierre Duhem. La Théorie Physique: son Object et sa Structure. 1906. Available as: The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1991.
B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
P. A. Flach. Conjectures: an inquiry concerning the logic of induction. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 1995.
D. Hume. A Treatise of Human Nature. 1739. Available as:E. C. Mossner (ed.), Penguin Books, London, United Kingdom, 1986.
T. Kunh. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1996: 3rd edition, 1962.
C. Lanczos. The Variational Principles of Mechanics. Dover Publications, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
P. Langley, H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw, and J. M. Zytkov. Scientific discovery. Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987.
J.S. Mill. A System of Logic. Longmans Green, London, United Kingdom, 1843.
I. Newton. Mathematical Principles. 1713. Available as: F. Cajori (ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. 1946.
H. Poincaré. La Science et L’Hypothèse. 1903. Available as: Science and Hypothesis, Dover Publications, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
K. Popper. Logik der Forschung. 1935. Available as: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge, London, United Kingdom, 1999.
K. Popper. Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, United Kingdom, 1963.
B. Russell. The Problems of Philosophy. Williams and Nogate, London, United Kingdom, 1957.
H. A. Simon, R. E. Valdés-Pérez, and D. H. Sleeman. Scientific discovery and simplicity of method. Artifical Intelligence, 91(2):177–181, 1997. Editorial of a Special Issue on Scientific Discovery.
M. Stone. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 36(1):111–147, 1974.
R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning. An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998.
V. N. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
A. N. Whitehead. Science and the Modern World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1926.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Piscopo, C., Birattari, M. (2002). Invention vs. Discovery A Critical Discussion. In: Lange, S., Satoh, K., Smith, C.H. (eds) Discovery Science. DS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2534. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36182-0_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36182-0_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00188-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36182-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive