Abstract
This article presents a framework for improving the Software Configuration Management (SCM) process, that includes a maturity model to assess software organizations and an approach to guide the transition from diagnosis to action planning. The maturity model and assessment tool are useful to identify the degree of satisfaction for practices considered key for SCM. The transition approach is also important because the application of a model to produce a diagnosis is just a first step, organizations are demanding the generation of action plans to implement the recommendations. The proposed framework has been used to assess a number of software organizations and to generate the basis to build an action plan for improvement. In summary, this article shows that the maturity model and action planning approach are instrumental to reach higher SCM control and visibility, therefore producing higher quality software.
This research has been funded in part by the National Commission on Scientific and Technological Research of the Government of Chile, CONICYT, through research project FONDECYT #1990845.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basily, V. and Weiss, D. A Methodology for Collecting Valid Software Engineering Data, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering: 728–738, 1984.
Berlack, H. Ronald. Software Configuration Management. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1992.
Cook, C. R. and Visconti, M. What to Do After the Asessment Report. Proceedings of Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, October 1999.
Grady, R. Successful Software Process Improvement. Hewlett-Packard Professional Books, 1997.
McFeeley, R. IDEAL: A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement. Technical Report CMU/SEI-96-HB-001. CMU/SEI, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1996.
Paulk M, Curtis B, Chrissis M, Weber C. Capability Maturity Model, version 1.1, IEEE Software 10(4): 18–27, 1993.
Paulk M, Curtis B, Chrissis M, Weber C. The Capability Maturity Model guidelines for improving the software process. Addison-Wesley: Reading, 1995.
Pfleeger, S.L. Software Engineering: Theory and Practice. Second edition. Prentice-Hall. 2001.
Radice, R. Getting to level 3 in the SEI’s CMM. Proceedings of VISION Conference, CRIM-ASEC, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, October 1996.
Villarroel, R. Modelo de Madurez de Gestión de Configuración de Software. Master’s Tesis, Departamento de Informática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile, June 2000. (in Spanish)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Visconti, M., Villarroel, R. (2002). Managing the Improvement of SCM Process. In: Oivo, M., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2559. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36209-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00234-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36209-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive