Skip to main content

From Speech Acts to Multi-agent Systems: The MAYBE Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 720 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2569))

Abstract

This paper describes a method of multi-agent analysis and design for reactive, real-time information systems, relating to complex and risks applications in medicine. According to specific needs in emergency healthcare units: spatio-temporal deployment of heterogeneous tasks, non-determinism of actors and self-organization in an unpredictable and/or disrupted environment, we propose MAYBE - Multi-Agent Yield-Based Engineering. MAYBE is a solution that makes possible for the agents to evolve and adapt by instantiation in different contexts. This paper details the various stages of the methodology applied to an emergency case, in parallel with the computerization of the process. It also compares the issues with other current work.

To : 1-Identify, 2-Understand, 3-Estimate, 4-Prevent, 5-Manage/Master/Back up

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Burstein, G. Ferguson and J. Allen Integrating, Agent-based Mixed-initiative Control with an Existing Multi-agent Planning System, in the Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Multi-agent Systems (ICMAS) (July 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Kinny, M. Georgeff and A. Rao, A methodology and modelling technique for systems of BDI agents. in:W. van de Velve and J. W. Perram eds, Agent Breaking Away: proceeding of the seventh european workshop on modelling autonomous agents in a multi-agent world, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence #1038, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1996) 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Gouardères, A. Minko and L. Richard, Cooperative Agents to Track Learner’s Cognitive Gaps, actes du congrès 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems’2000 (Montréal, Canada), Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences #1839,(Springer ed, 2000), 443–453.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Frasson, L. Martin, G. Gouardères and E. Aimeur, LANCA: a distance Learning Architecture based on Networked Cognitive Agents. 40 International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems-ITS’98-(San Antonio, USA, 1998), Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences 1452, (Springer Verlag) 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Kriaa and G. Gouardères, Revisable Analysis and Design by Actors Interaction: Emergency Case Study, in R. Kowalczyk, S.W. Loke, N.E. Reed, G. Graham eds.: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence #2112, (Springer ed., 2001), 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Miles, M. Joy and M. Luck, Designing Agent-Oriented Systems by Analysing Agent Interactions. In P. Ciancarini and M. Wooldridge editors, Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Springer-Verlag 1957, 2001), 171–183.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Wagner, Toward Agent-Oriented Information Systems. Technical report, Institute for Information, University of Leipzig, March 1999. AOIS

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Wood and S. A. DeLoach. An Overview of the Multiagent Systems Engineering Methodology. The First International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE-2000), (Limerick, Ireland, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Allan, Speech act theory-an overview. Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories in E. K. Brown & J. Miller eds, (Oxford: Elsevier Science, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kendall, E. A., “Patterns of Agent Analysis and Design,” in Handbook of Agent Technology, J. Bradshaw, Ed., AAAI Press/ MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S.K. Card, T.P. Moran and A. Newell, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. (Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. De Haan, ETAG-based Design: User Interface Design as Mental Model Specification. In: Palanque and Benyon eds. Critical Issues in User Interface Systems Engineering. (Springer Verlag, London, 1996), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. A. Cerri, Shifting the focus from control to communication: the STReams OBjects Environments model of communicating agents, in J. Padget Eds, Collaboration between human and artificial societies vol. 1624, LNAI, (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999), 71–101.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. A. Cerri, V. Loia, and D. Maraschi, Jaskemal: a language for Java agents interacting in Scheme, Presented at Workshop on Interaction Agents, (L’Acquila, Italy).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gouardères, S., Gouardères, G., Delpy, P. (2002). From Speech Acts to Multi-agent Systems: The MAYBE Method. In: Karagiannis, D., Reimer, U. (eds) Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management. PAKM 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2569. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36277-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36277-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00314-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36277-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics