Skip to main content

Things Are Not Always Equal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2588))

  • 864 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the use of subsumption as device to model linguistic generalizations. Constraint-based linguistic frameworks make ample use of equality relations but, although equality is nothing but two-way subsumption, subsumption itself has not been used much, except as a metagrammatical device in the HPSG type hierarchy. Here we investigate two cases where subsumption is a useful device to model syntactic phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abeillé, A., 1997, Fonction ou position Objet?Le gré des langues 12, pp. 8–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonami, O., D. Godard & J.-M. Marandin, 1999, Constituency and Word Order in French Subject Inversion. In G. Bouma, E. Hinrichs, G.-J. Kruijff & R. Oehrle (eds.) Constraints and Resources in Natural Language Syntax and Semantics, pp. 21–40. Stanford, CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter, B., 1992, The Logic of Feature Structures, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan, R. M. & J. Bresnan, 1982, Lexical Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 173–281. Cambridge, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan, R. M. & J. Wedekind, 1993, Restriction and Correspondence-Based Translation. Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics European Chapter, pp. 193–202, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan, R. M. & J. Maxwell III, 1988, Constituent Coordination in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Proceedings of COLING-88 vol 1. pp. 303–305, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaplan, R. M. and A. Zaenen, 1989, Long-distance Dependencies, Constituent Structures, and Functional Uncertainty. In M. Baltin and A. Kroch (eds.) Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, pp. 17–42, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kayne, R., 1972, Subject Inversion in French Interrogatives. In J. Casagrande & B. Saciuk (eds.) Generative Studies in Romance Languages, pp. 70–126. Rowley, MA, Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meurers, D. & K. De Kuthy, 2001, A. Rossdeutscher, and H. Kamp, Linguistic Form and its Computation, pp. 29–64, Stanford, CSLI Publicati

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nerbonne, J., 1995, Partial Verb Phrases and Spurious Ambiguities. In J. Nerbonne, K. Netter and C. Pollard, eds., German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 109–150, Stanford, CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shieber, S. M., 1989, Parsing and Type Inference for Natural and Computer Languages, SRI International Technical Note 460, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uszkoreit, H., 1987, Complex Fronting in German. In G. J. Huck and A. Ojeda, eds., Discontinuous Constituency, Syntax and Semantics, vol. 20, pp. 405–425, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zaenen, A. 1989, The Place of Bevallen (please) in the Syntax of Dutch. SSL-89-17, System Sciences Laboratory, PARC, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zaenen, Annie and Ronald M. Kaplan, 1985, Formal Devices for Linguistic Generalization: West Germanic Word Order in LFG. In M. Dalrymple, M. R. Kaplan, J. Maxwell III, and A. Zaenen (eds.) Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, pp. 215–239, Stanford, CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zaenen, Annie & Ronald M. Kaplan, 2002, Subject Inversion in French: Equality and Inequality in LFG. In C. Beyssade, O. Bonami, P. Cabredo-Hofherr and F. Corblin, eds., CSSP 2001, Paris, Presses Universitaires de la Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zaenen, Annie & Ronald M. Kaplan, 2002, Subsumption and Equality: German Partial Fronting in LFG. In M. Butt and T. King, eds. Proceedings of the LFG02 Conference, Stanford, CSLI on-line publications. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaplan, R.M., Zaenen, A. (2003). Things Are Not Always Equal. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2588. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36456-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36456-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00532-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36456-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics