Skip to main content

PGR: Portuguese Attorney General’s Office Decisions on the Web

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web Knowledge Management and Decision Support (INAP 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2543))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A multi-agent based architecture for the Portuguese Attorney General's Office documents is presented. The architecture has two layers: the first one uses natural language processing techniques to manage the legal text bases; the second one, uses dynamic logic programming to define agents, which cooperatively handle the interaction between users and the text bases. The natural language processing layer uses a lexical dictionary and a Portuguese POS (part of speech) tagger to improve the results of the text search engine. Moreover, the retrieved documents are clustered in topics, helping the users to refine their queries and to select the desired documents. The interaction layer uses agents to model cooperativity and to handle the multi-modal interactions (natural language sentences and graphical actions). The proposed architecture was implemented in a Linux environment using Prolog.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. J. Alferes, L. M. Pereira, H. Przymusinska, T. C. Przymusinski, and P. Quaresma. Dynamic knowledge representation and its applications. In S. Cerri and D. Dochev, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence-Methodology, Systems, Applications (AIMSA’2000), number 1904 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1–10, Varna, lgary, September 2000. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tania Bueno, Christiane von Wangenheim, Eduardo Mattos, Hugo Hoeschl, and Ricardo Barcia. Jurisconsulto: Retrieval in jurisprudencial text bases using juridical terminology. In Proceedings of the ICAIL’99-7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 147–155. ACM, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. R. Cutting, J. O. Pedersen D. R. Karger, and J. W. Tukey. Scatter/ gather: A cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In Proc. 15th Annual Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. on R&D in IR, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. R. Cutting, D. Karger, and J. Pedersen. Constant interaction-time scatter/gathern browsing of very large document collections. In Proc. of the 16th Annual Int. ACM/SIGIR Conf., Pittsburgh, PA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sandra Carberry and Lynn Lambert. A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogs. Computational Linguistics, 25(1), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Greenleaf, A. Mowbray, and G. King. Law on the net via austlii — 14 m hypertext links can’t be right? In In Information Online and On Disk’97 Conference, Sydney, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. A. Hearst and J. O. Pedersen. Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference,Zurich, June 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diane Litman and James Allen. A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversation. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nuno Marques and Jose Gabriel Lopes. Tagging with small training corpora. In LNAI-Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James Osborn and Leon Sterling. A judicial search tool using intelligent concept extraction. In Proceedings of the ICAIL’99-7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 173–181. ACM, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Agustini G. Lopes P. Gamallo, C. Gasperin and V. Lima. The use of syntactic context for measuring word similarity. In ESSLI-Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Knowledge Acquisition and categorization

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martha Pollack. Plans as complex mental attitudes. In Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communications. MIT Press Cambridge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luis Moniz Pereira and Paulo Quaresma. Modelling agent interaction in logic programming. In Osamu Yoshie, editor, INAP’98-The 11th International Conference on Applications of Prolog, pages 150–156, Tokyo, Japan, September 1998. Science University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Quaresma and J. G. Lopes. Unified logic programming approach to the abduction of plans and intentions in information-seeking dialogues. Journal of Logic Programming, 54, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Quaresma and I. Rodrigues. Pgr: A cooperative legal ir system on the web. In Graham Greenleaf and Andrew Mowbray, editors, 2nd AustLII Conference on Law and Internet, Sydney, Australia, 1999. Invited paper.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paulo Quaresma and Irene Pimenta Rodrigues. Automatic classification and intelligent clustering for wwweb information retrieval systems. Journal of Information Law and Technology (JILT), 2, 2000. http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/00-2/-Extended and revised version of the BILETA’2000 paper.

  17. Paulo Quaresma and Irene Rodrigues. Using logic programming to model multi-agent web legal systems-an application report. In Proceedings of the ICAIL’01-International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, St. Louis, USA, May 2001. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gerard Salton. Automatic text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Addison-Wesley, 1989. Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. John Yearwood and Andrew Stranieri. The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system. In Proceedings of the ICAIL’99-7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 117–125. ACM, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quaresma, P., Pimenta Rodrigues, I. (2003). PGR: Portuguese Attorney General’s Office Decisions on the Web. In: Bartenstein, O., Geske, U., Hannebauer, M., Yoshie, O. (eds) Web Knowledge Management and Decision Support. INAP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2543. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36524-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36524-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00680-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36524-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics