Abstract
As a basis for user needs and system design assessments in assistive technology (AT), we have developed a new conceptual framework and battery of tests and research paradigms, on a continuing improvement basis. The framework consists of three levels, to provide; overall guidance, specific models for understanding data and task analysis. Following earlier work [1], we report three case studies, considering attentional problems and user-specific needs, to validate our core test elements and conceptual framework. Our systematic method generated specific benefits for our users and pointed out the need for cognitive software in assistive technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, R., Langdon, P., and Clarkson, P.J., (2002), A systematic basis for developing cognitive assessment methods for assistive technology. C6. pp 53–62. In Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., and Robinson, P. (Eds. ) Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Springer.
Broadbent, D. E. (1984) The Maltese cross: a new simplistic model or memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 55–94.
Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1994). Abstract word meaning deafness. Cognitive neuropsychology, 11, 1–34.
Van Lancker, D., Cummings, J. L., Kreiman, J. & Dobkin, B. H. (1988). Phonagnosia: A dissociation between familiar and unfamiliar voices. Cortex, 24, 1–15.
Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and Practice. Hove, U.K. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate
Shallice, T. (1991). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 429–439.
Barnard, P.J., May, J., Duke, D. and Duce, D. (2000). Systems interactions and macrotheory. Transactions on Computer Human interface, 7, 222–262.
Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel distributed processing. Volume 1. (McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. Eds.). Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge M. A.: Harvard University Press.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.
Handy, T. C., Hopfinger, J. B. and Mangan, G. R. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of attention. In Cabeza, R. and Kingstone, A. (Eds.) Handbook of Functional Neuroimaging of Cognition. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Hartley, L. R. and Adams, R. G. (1974). Effect of noise on the stroop test. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 102, 62–66.
Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s progressive matrices; Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 32–47.
Lord, W. (1994).a review of item content in the fifth edition of the 16PF. London: ASE.
Adams, R. G. and Berry, C. (1981). Cued recall of sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 295–307.
Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Shepherd, R. N. (1978). The mental image, American Psychologist, 33 125–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Langdon, 1., Adams, R., Clarkson, P.J. (2003). Universal Access to Assistive Technology through Client-Centred Cognitive Assessment. In: Carbonell, N., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. UI4ALL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2615. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00855-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36572-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive