Skip to main content

Universal Access to Assistive Technology through Client-Centred Cognitive Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience (UI4ALL 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2615))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

As a basis for user needs and system design assessments in assistive technology (AT), we have developed a new conceptual framework and battery of tests and research paradigms, on a continuing improvement basis. The framework consists of three levels, to provide; overall guidance, specific models for understanding data and task analysis. Following earlier work [1], we report three case studies, considering attentional problems and user-specific needs, to validate our core test elements and conceptual framework. Our systematic method generated specific benefits for our users and pointed out the need for cognitive software in assistive technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R., Langdon, P., and Clarkson, P.J., (2002), A systematic basis for developing cognitive assessment methods for assistive technology. C6. pp 53–62. In Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., and Robinson, P. (Eds. ) Universal Access and Assistive Technology. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broadbent, D. E. (1984) The Maltese cross: a new simplistic model or memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 55–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1994). Abstract word meaning deafness. Cognitive neuropsychology, 11, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Lancker, D., Cummings, J. L., Kreiman, J. & Dobkin, B. H. (1988). Phonagnosia: A dissociation between familiar and unfamiliar voices. Cortex, 24, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and Practice. Hove, U.K. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shallice, T. (1991). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barnard, P.J., May, J., Duke, D. and Duce, D. (2000). Systems interactions and macrotheory. Transactions on Computer Human interface, 7, 222–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel distributed processing. Volume 1. (McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. Eds.). Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge M. A.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Handy, T. C., Hopfinger, J. B. and Mangan, G. R. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of attention. In Cabeza, R. and Kingstone, A. (Eds.) Handbook of Functional Neuroimaging of Cognition. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartley, L. R. and Adams, R. G. (1974). Effect of noise on the stroop test. Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 102, 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s progressive matrices; Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lord, W. (1994).a review of item content in the fifth edition of the 16PF. London: ASE.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Adams, R. G. and Berry, C. (1981). Cued recall of sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shepherd, R. N. (1978). The mental image, American Psychologist, 33 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Langdon, 1., Adams, R., Clarkson, P.J. (2003). Universal Access to Assistive Technology through Client-Centred Cognitive Assessment. In: Carbonell, N., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience. UI4ALL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2615. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36572-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00855-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36572-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics