Skip to main content

Measuring Scene Complexity to Adapt Feature Selection of Model-Based Object Tracking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Vision Systems (ICVS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2626))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In vision-based robotic systems the robust tracking of scene features is a key element of grasping, navigation and interpretation tasks. The stability of feature initialisation and tracking is strongly influenced by ambient conditions, like lighting and background, and their changes over time. This work presents how robustness can be increased especially in complex scenes by reacting to a measurement of the scene content. Element candidates are proposed, to indicate the scene complexity remaining after running a method. Local cue integration and global topological constraints are applied to select the best feature set. Experiments show in particular the success of the approach to disambiguate features in complex scenes.

This work has been supported by the EU-Project ActIPret under grant IST-2001-32184.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.S. Beis, D.G. Lowe. Indexing without Invariants in 3D object recognition. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 21(10), pp.1000–1015, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.A. Fischler and R.C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Förstner. 10 Pros and Cons Against Performance Characterization of Vision Algorithms. Workshop on Perf. Characteristics of Vis. Algorithms, Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W.E.L. Grimson. Object Recognition by Computer: The Role of Geometric Constraints. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.D. Hager, K. Toyama. The XVision-System: A Portable Substrate for Real-Time Vision Applications, CV and Image Understanding 69(1), pp. 23–37, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Harris. Tracking with rigid models, A. Blake, A. Yuille, eds., Active Vision, MIT Press, pp 59–73, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Jörg, J. Langwald, J. Stelter, and G. Hirzinger. Flexible robot-assembly using a multi-sensory approach. IEEE ICRA, pp.3687–3694, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Julesz. Early Vision and focal attention; Reviews of Modern Physics 63(3), pp.735–772, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Kragic, A. Miller, P. Allen. RealTime Tracking Meets Online Grasp Planning. IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp.2460–2465,2001

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.G. Lowe. Robust Model-Based Motion Tracking Through the Integration of Search and Estimation. Int. J. of Computer Vision Vol.8(2), pp.113–122, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Moreno, A. Tarrida, J. Andrade Cetto, A. Sanfeliu. 3D real-time head tracking fusing color histograms and stereovision. Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.E. Palmer. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.L. Thompson, I.D. Reid, L.A. Munoz, D.W. Murray. Providing synthetic views for teleoperation using visual pose tracking in multiple cameras. IEEE SMC Part A 31(1), 43–54, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Tonko, N.H. Nagel. Model-based Stereo-Tracking of Non-Polyhedral Objects for Automatic Disassembly Experiments. Int. J. of Comp. Vision 37(1):99–118, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Toyama, A. Blake. Probabilistic Tracking of a Metric Space. Int. Conference on Computer Vision, pp.50–59, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Vincze, M. Ayromlou, W. Ponweiser, and M. Zillich. Edge-projected integration of image and model cues for robust model-based object tracking. Int. Jounal of Robotics Research, 20(7):533–552, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Zisserman, D. Forsyth, J. Mundy, and C. Rothwell at.al. 3D object recognition using invariance. Artificial Intelligence, 78:239–288, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ayromlou, M., Zillich, M., Ponweiser, W., Vincze, M. (2003). Measuring Scene Complexity to Adapt Feature Selection of Model-Based Object Tracking. In: Crowley, J.L., Piater, J.H., Vincze, M., Paletta, L. (eds) Computer Vision Systems. ICVS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2626. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36592-3_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36592-3_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00921-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36592-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics