Skip to main content

Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to the Rehabilitation of a Water Distribution System: A Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2632))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recognising the multiobjective nature of the decision process for rehabilitation of water supply distribution systems, this paper presents a comparative study of two multiobjective evolutionary methods, namely, multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA) and strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA). The analyses were conducted on a simple hypothetical network for cost minimisation and minimum pressure requirement, treated as a two-objective problem. For the application example studied, SPEA outperforms MOGA in terms of the Pareto fronts produced and processing time required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shamir, U., Howard, C.D.D.: An Analytic Approach to Scheduling Pipe Replacement. Journal American Water Works Association, Vol. 71, No. 5 (1979) 248–258

    Google Scholar 

  2. Walski, T.M.: Economic Analysis of Rehabilitation of Water Mains. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. 3 (1982) 296–308

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, R.M., Stafford, C.L., Goodrich, J.A.: Water Distribution Systems: A Spatial Cost Evaluation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Vol. 108WR 3 (1982) 243–255

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kleiner, Y., Adams B. J., Rogers, J. S.: Long-Term Planning Metodology for Water Distribution System Rehabilitation. Water Resources Research, Vol. 34, No. 8 (1998) 2039–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, J.H., Mays, L.W.: Optimal Rehabilitation Model for Water Distribution Systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 5 (1994) 674–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walski, T.M.: The Wrong Paradigm, Why Water Distribution Optimization Doesn’t Work. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management (Editorial), ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 3 (2001) 203–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelhardt, M.O., Skipworth, P.J., Savic, D.A., Saul, A.J., Walters, G.A.: Rehabilitation Strategies for Water Distribution Networks: a Literature Review with a UK Perspective. Urban Water, No. 2 (2000) 153–170

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P. J.: An Overview of Evolutionary in Multiobjective Optimization. Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1995) 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P. J.: Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Formulation, Discussion and Generalization. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horn, J., Nafpliotis, N.: Multiobjective Optimization using the Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm. Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Vol. 1 (1994) 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivas, N., Deb, K.: Multiobjective Optimization using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vol. 2, No 3 (1995) 221–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 3, No 4 (1999) 257–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm — NSGAII. KanGAL Report Number 2000001 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Veldhuizen, D. V.: Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Classifications, Analyses, and New Innovations. Ph. D. Thesis, Dayton, OH: Air Force Institute of Technology (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simpson, A. R., Dandy, G.C., Murphy, L. J.: Genetic Algorithms Compared to Other Techniques for Pipe Optimization. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 4 (1994) 423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walters, G.A., Halhal, D., Savic, D.A., Ouazar, D.: Improved Design of Anytown Distribution Network using Structured Messy Genetic Algorithms. Urban Water, Vol. 1 (1999) 23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Halhal, D., Walters, G.A., Savic, D.A., Ouazar, D.: Scheduling of Water Distribution System Rehabilitation using Structured Messy Genetic Algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 7, No. 3 (1999) 311–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dandy, G.C., Engelhardt, M.O.: Optimum Rehabilitation of Water Distribution System considering Cost and Reliability. Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Orlando, Florida, (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rossman, L. A.: EPANET 2, USERS MANUAL. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ray, T., Tai K., Seow, K.C.: Multiobjective Design Optimization by an Evolutionary Algorithm. Engineering Optimization, Vol. 33 (2001) 399–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Michalewicz, Z.: Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y., (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Gen e Cheng: Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design. John Wiley & Sons, INC, (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wall, M.: Galib: A C++ Library of Genetic Algorithm Components (version 2.4). Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jaskiewicz, A.: MOMHLIB++: Multiple Objective Metaheuristics Library in C++. http://www-idss.cs.put.poznan.pl/~jaszkiewicz/MOMHLIB.

  27. Gessler, J.: Pipe Network Optimization by Enumeration. Proceedings Computer Applications for Water Resources, ASCE, New York, N.Y., (1985) 572–581

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goldberg, D.E.: Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm, Virtual Alphabets, and Blocking. Complex Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2 (1991) 139–168

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheung, P.B., Reis, L.F.R., Formiga, K.T.M., Chaudhry, F.H., Ticona, W.G.C. (2003). Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms Applied to the Rehabilitation of a Water Distribution System: A Comparative Study. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2632. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36970-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36970-8_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-01869-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36970-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics