Skip to main content

A Normative and Intentional Agent Model for Organisation Modelling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Societies in the Agents World III (ESAW 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2577))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 344 Accesses

Abstract

This paper proposes a new agent model, including normative aspects based on studies from social psychology. The three main model components are the Epistemic, Deontic and Axiologic components. This model structure facilitates the representation of normative organisational knowledge and processes as well as the relations between individual and social interests. Instead of manipulating the notions of belief, intention, desire, commitment, goal and obligation, the only primitives needed are belief and generalized goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antunes, L. and H. Coelho, 1999. Rationalising decisions using multiple values, Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science, Siena, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antunes, L. and H. Coelho, 1999. Decisions based upon multiple values: the BVG agent architecture. Proceedings of the Portuguese AI Conference EPIA99, Springer-Verlag LNAI (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence) n° 1695, pp. 297–311, Évora, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belnap, N., 1991. Backwards and Forwards in the Modal Logic of Agency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castelfranchi, C., 1993. Commitments: from Individual Intentions to Groups and Organisations. In Working Notes of AAAI.93 Workshop on AI and Theory of Groups and Organisations: Conceptual and Empirical Research,.35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Castelfranchi, F. Dignum, C. Jonker and J. Treur, 1999. Deliberate Normative Agents: Principles and Architectures. In N. Jennings and Y. Lesperance (eds.) Proceedings of ATAL-99, Orlando, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, P. and H. Levesque, 1990. Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42:213–261.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conte, R., and C. Castelfranchi, 1995. Cognitive and Social Action, UCL Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dignum, F., J-J Ch. Meyer and R. Wieringa, 1994. A Dynamic Logic for Reasoning About Sub-Ideal States. In J. Breuker (Ed.), ECAI Workshop on Artificial Normative Reasoning, pp.79–92, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Dignum, D. Morley, E. Sonenberg, and L. Cavendon. Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, ICMAS-2000, Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Filipe, J., 2000. Normative Organisational Modelling using Intelligent Multi-Agent Systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Staffordshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilpinen, R., 1971. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, A. and M. Georgeff, 1991. Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI architecture. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Nebel, Rich, and Swartout, Eds.) pp.439–449. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shoham, Y., 1993. Agent-Oriented Programming. Artificial Intelligence, 60, pp.51–92, Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stamper, R., 1996. Signs, Information, Norms and Systems. In Holmqvist et al. (Eds.), Signs of Work, Semiosis and Information Processing in Organizations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Singh, M., 1990. Towards a Theory of Situated Know-How. 9th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Singh, M., 1996. Multiagent Systems as Spheres of Commitment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS)-Workshop on Norms, Obligations and Conventions. Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Werner, E., 1989. Cooperating Agents: A Unified Theory of Communication and Social Structure. In Gasser and Huhns (Eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp.3–36, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. von Wright, G., 1951. Deontic Logic. Mind, 60, pp.1–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Filipe, J. (2003). A Normative and Intentional Agent Model for Organisation Modelling. In: Petta, P., Tolksdorf, R., Zambonelli, F. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World III. ESAW 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2577. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39173-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39173-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-14009-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39173-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics