Abstract
This paper discusses an informal methodology for evaluating Machine Translation software documentation with reference to a case study, in which a number of currently available MT packages are evaluated. Different types of documentation style are discussed, as well as different user profiles. It is found that documentation is often inadequate in identifying the level of linguistic background and knowledge necessary to use translation software, and in explaining technical (linguistic) terms needed to use the software effectively. In particular, the level of knowledge and training needed to use the software is often incompatible with the user profile implied by the documentation. Also, guidance on how to perform more complex tasks, which may be especially idiosyncratic, is often inadequate or missing altogether.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wilks, Y.: Developments in machine translation research in the US. Aslib Proceedings. 46 (1994) 111–116
Mowatt, D., Somers, H.: Criteria for evaluating MT documentation. In prep.
Carroll, J. M.: The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (1990)
Farkas, D. K., Williams, T. R.: John Carroll’s The Nurnberg Funnel and Minimalist Documentation. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 33 (1990) 182–187
Langendscheidt’s T1: Text Translator for PC English-Spanish Spanish-English. GMS Gesellschaft für multinguale Systeme mbH/Langenscheidt KG, Berlin. (1997)
Mirel, B.: Critical Review of Experimental Research on the Usability of Hard Copy Documentation. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 34 (1991) 109–122
Flesch, R.: The Art of Readable Writing. Harper Brothers, New York. (1949)
Taylor, W. L.: “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool For Measuring Readability. Journalism Quarterly. 30 (1953) 415–433
Hill, A. L., Scharff, L.F.V.: Readability of computer displays as a function of colour, saturation, and background texture. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Oxford, England. (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mowatt, D., Somers, H. (2000). Is MT Software Documentation Appropriate for MT Users?. In: White, J.S. (eds) Envisioning Machine Translation in the Information Future. AMTA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1934. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39965-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39965-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41117-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39965-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive