Skip to main content

Tree Spanners for Subgraphs and Related Tree Covering Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (WG 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1928))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For any fixed parameter k ≥ 1, a tree k-spanner of a graph G is a spanning tree T in G such that the distance between every pair of vertices in T is at most k times their distance in G. In this paper, we generalize on this very restrictive concept, and introduce Steiner tree k-spanners: We are given an input graph consisting of terminals and Steiner vertices, and we are now looking for a tree k-spanner that spans all terminals.

The complexity status of deciding the existence of a Steiner tree k- spanner is easy for some k: it is \( \mathcal{G} \)-hard for k ≥ 4, and it is in \( \mathcal{P} \) for k = 1. For the case k = 2, we develop a model in terms of an equivalent tree covering problem, and use this to show \( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P} \)-hardness. By showing the \( \mathcal{N}\mathcal{P} \) -hardness also for the case k = 3, the complexity results for all k are complete.

We also consider the problem of finding a smallest Steiner tree k-spanner (if one exists at all). For any arbitrary k ≥ 2, we prove that we cannot hope to find efficiently a Steiner tree k-spanner that is closer to the smallest one than within a logarithmic factor. We conclude by discussing some problems related to the model for the case k = 2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. I. Althöfer, G. Das, D. Dobkin, D. Joseph, and J. Soares. On sparse spanners of weighted graphs. Discrete Computational Geometry, 9:81–100, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Cai and D.G. Corneil. Tree spanners. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 8(3):359–387, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Crescenzi and V. Kann. A compendium of NP optimization pro-blems. Technical ReportSI/RR-95/02, Univ. di Roma La Sapienza, 1995. http://www.nada.kth.se/theory/problemlist.html.

  4. 4.-U. Feige. A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. In Proc. 28th Annual ACM Symp. Theory of Computing, STOC’96, pages 314–318. ACM Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP Completeness. W H Freeman & Co Ltd, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Handke. Graphs with Distance Guarantees. PhD thesis, Universität Konstanz, Germany, 1999. http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2000/377.

  7. F. Harary. Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Handke and G. Kortsarz. Tree spanners for subgraphs and related tree covering problems. Konstanzer Schriften in Mathematik und Informatik 44, Universität Konstanz, 1997, revised version of Feb. 2000.http://www.fmi.uni-konstanz.de/Schriften/.

  9. B.K. Haberman and G.N. Rouskas. Cost, delay, and delay variation conscious multicast routing. Technical Report TR-97-03, Dept. of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F.K. Hwang, D.S. Richards, and P. Winter. The Steiner Tree Problem, volume 53 of Annals of Discrete Mathematics. North-Holland, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Kortsarz. On the hardness of approximating spanners. In Proc. International Workshop Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization, AP-PROX’98, pages 135–146. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1444, Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Peleg and A. A. Schaeér. Graph spanners. J. of Graph Theory, 13:99–116, 1989.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Peleg and J.D. Ullman. An optimal synchronizer for the hypercube. In Proc. 6th ACM Symp. Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, pages 77–85, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.N. Rouskas and I. Baldine. Multicast routing with end-to-end delay and delay variation constraints. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communications, 15(3):346–356, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Handke, D., Kortsarz, G. (2000). Tree Spanners for Subgraphs and Related Tree Covering Problems. In: Brandes, U., Wagner, D. (eds) Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science. WG 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1928. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40064-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40064-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41183-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40064-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics