Skip to main content

Reasoning with Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1969))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 717 Accesses

Abstract

We consider problems of reasoning with a knowledge-base, which is represented by an ordered binary decision diagram (OBDD), for two special cases of general and Horn knowledge-bases. Our main results say that both finding a model of a knowledge-base and deducing from a knowledge-base can be done in linear time for general case, but that abduction is NP-complete even if the knowledge-base is restricted to be Horn. Then, we consider the abduction when its assumption set consists of all propositional literals (i.e., an answer for a given query is allowed to include any positive literals), and show that it can be done in polynomial time if the knowledge-base is Horn, while it remains NP-complete for the general case. Some other solvable cases are also discussed.

This research was partially supported by the Scientific Grant-in-Aid from Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S.B. Akers, “Binary Decision Diagrams,” IEEE Trans. Comput., C-27, no.6, pp.509–516, 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K.S. Brace, R.L. Rundell, and R.E. Bryant, “Efficient Implementation of a BDD Package,” Proc. of 27th ACM/IEEE DAC, pp.40–45, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.E. Bryant, “Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation,” IEEE Trans. Comput., C-35, no.8, pp.677–691, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O. Coudert, “Doing Two-Level Logic Minimization 100 Times Faster,” Proc. of 6th ACM/SIAM SODA, pp.112–118, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.F. Dowling and J.H. Gallier, “Linear Time Algorithms for Testing the Satisfiability of Horn Formula,” J. Logic Programm., 3, pp.267–284, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Eiter and G. Gottlob, “The Complexity of Logic-Based Abduction,” Journal of the ACM, 42(1), pp.3–42, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Horiyama and T. Ibaraki, “Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams as Knowledge-Bases,” Proc. of 10th ISAAC, LNCS 1741, pp.83–92, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H.A. Kautz, M.J. Kearns, and B. Selman, “Reasoning with Characteristic Models,” Proc. of AAAI-93, pp.34–39, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.A. Kautz, M.J. Kearns, and B. Selman, “Horn Approximations of Empirical Data,” Artificial Intelligence, 74, pp.129–245, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. H.A. Kautz and B. Selman, “An Empirical Evaluation of Knowledge Compilation by Theory Approximation,” in Proc. AAAI-94, 1994, pp.155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.C. Madre and J.P. Billion, “Proving Circuit Correctness using Formal Comparison Between Expected and Extracted Behaviour,” Proc. of 25th ACM/IEEE DAC, pp.205–210, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.C. Madre and O. Coudert, “A Logically Complete Reasoning Maintenance System Based on a Logical Constraint Solver,” Proc. of IJCAI-91, pp.294–299, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. McCarthy and P.J. Hayes, “Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence,” in Machine Intelligence 4, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Selman and H.J. Levesque, “Abductive and Default Reasoning: A Computational Core,” Proc. of AAAI-90, pp.343–348, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Somenzi, CUDD: CU Decision Diagram Package, University of Colorado at Boulder http://vlsi.colorado.edu/, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Takahashi, N. Ishiura, and S. Yajima, “Fault Simulation for Multiple Faults Using BDD Representation of Fault Sets,” in Proc. IEEE/ACM ICCAD-91, pp.550–553, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horiyama, T., Ibaraki, T. (2000). Reasoning with Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams. In: Goos, G., Hartmanis, J., van Leeuwen, J., Lee, D.T., Teng, SH. (eds) Algorithms and Computation. ISAAC 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1969. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40996-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-40996-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40996-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics