Skip to main content

A Methodology for Multiple-Fault Diagnosis Based on the Independent Choice Logic

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (IBERAMIA 2000, SBIA 2000)

Abstract

We propose a methodology to diagnose multiple faults in complex systems. The approach is based on the Independent Choice Logic (ICL) and comprises two phases. In phase 1 we generate the explanations of the observed symptoms and handle the combinatorial explosion with a heuristic. In phase 2 we observe process signals to detect abnormal behavior that can lead us to identify the real faulted components. A proposal is made to automate this task with Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs) embedded in the ICL formalism. The overall scheme is intended to give a definite diagnosis. ICL is a framework, which comprises a theory and a development environment. We show that ICL can be scaled-up to real-world, industrial-strength problems by using it in diagnosing faults in an electrical power transmission network .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cordier M-O., Dague P., Dumas M., LĂ©vy F., Montmain J., Staroswiecki M. and TravĂ©-MassuyĂ©s: A Comparative Analysis of AI and Control Theory Approaches to Model-based Diagnosis. Proc. of the 11th International Workshop on Diagnosis Principles. Morelia, Mich., MĂ©xico, Junio 8–11, 2000, pp. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dabbaghchi I. and Gursky R.: An Abductive Expert System for Interpretation of Real-Time Data. IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery (1993) 8(3): 1061–1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Kleer J. and Williams B.: Diagnosing Multiple Faults. Artificial Intelligence (1987) 32(1): 97–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Kleer J., Mackworth A., and Reiter R.: Characterizing Diagnoses. In Proc. AAAI-90 Boston, MA 324–330.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garza L., CantĂș F., and Acevedo S.: Technical Processes Fault Diagnosis with an Extended Independent Choice Logic. Proc. of the 11th International Workshop on Diagnosis Principles. Morelia, Mich., MĂ©xico, Junio 8–11, 2000, pp. 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reliability Test System Task Force, Application of Probability Methods Subcomitee: IEEE Reliability Test System. IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, (1979) 98(6): 2047–2054.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isermann R.: Supervision, Fault-Detection and Fault-Diagnosis Methods-an Introduction. Control Engineering Practice (1997) 5(5): 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Isermann R. and BallĂ© P. 1997. Trends in the Application of Model-Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Technical Processes. Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 709–719.

    Google Scholar 

  9. JĂ€rventausta P., Verho P., and Partanen J.: Using Fuzzy Sets to Model The Uncertainty in the Fault Location Process of distribution Networks. IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery (1994) 9(2): 954–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Lunze and F. Schiller 1999. An Example of Fault Diagnosis by Means of Probabilistic Logic Reasoning. Control Engineering Practice 7: 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Narasimhan S., Zhao F., Biswas G. and Hung E.: An Integrated Framework for Combining Global and Local Analyses in Diagnosing Hybrid Systems. Proc. of the 11th International Workshop on Diagnosis Principles. Morelia, Mich., MĂ©xico, Junio 8–11, 2000, pp. 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pearl J.:Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. (1988) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peng Y. and Reggia J.: Abductive Inference Models for Diagnostic Problem-Solving.(1990) Symbolic Computation-AI Series (Springer, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Poole D.: Normality and Faults in Logic-Based Diagnosis. In Proc. of the IJCAI, Detroit, August 1989, pp. 1304–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poole D.: Probabilistic Horn Abduction and Bayesian Networks. Artificial Intelligence (1993) 64: 81–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Poole D.: The Independent Choice Logic for Modeling Multiple Agents under Uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence(1997) 94(1–2), special issue on economic principles of multi-agent systems, pp. 7–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Poole D.: Independent Choice Logic Interpreter version 0.2.1 PROLOG CODE, Technical Report, Dept. of Computer Science, (1998) University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Poole D.: Abducing through Negation as Failure: Stable models within the independent choice logic, to appear, Journal of Logic Programming, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reiter R.: A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles. Artificial Intelligence (1987) 32(1): 57–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sidhu T., Cruder O., and Huff G.: An Abductive Inference Technique for Fault Diagnosis in Electrical Power Transmission Networks. IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery (1997) 12(1): 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vázquez E., Chacón O., and Altuve H.: An On-line Expert System for Fault Section Diagnosis in Power Systems. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems (1997) 12(1): 357–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garza, L.E., CantĂș, F., Acevedo, S. (2000). A Methodology for Multiple-Fault Diagnosis Based on the Independent Choice Logic. In: Monard, M.C., Sichman, J.S. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. IBERAMIA SBIA 2000 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1952. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44399-1_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41276-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44399-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics