Skip to main content

Assigning Tasks to Resource Pools: A Fuzzy Set Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1873))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1771 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we address the problem of assigning tasks to resource pools. Each task has certain resource requirements, but with the capacity to provide these resources varying from pool to pool. We represent each task as a finite fuzzy set whose support consists of the resources and whose memberships reflect the degree of importance of each resource in performing this specific task. The resource pools are also represented by finite fuzzy sets having the same support, but now the memberships reflect the capability of a specific pool to provide each of these resources. We next define a measure of compatibility between each task and each resource pool. This compatibility is itself a fuzzy set which we defuzzify via the center of area (COA) method. We then develop an algorithm that describes how to recursively assign tasks to resource pools until some prespecified compatibility criterion has been violated. Finally, we add an assessment of cost to our algorithm, thereby enhancing its potential for practical application.

This research was sponsored in part by ARO grant number DAAH-0495-1-0250 and NSF grant number CDA-9522157.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, J., Balas, E. and Zawack, D. (1988): The shifting bottleneck procedure for job scheduling. Management Science34, 391–401.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. and Hurwicz, L., (eds.), (1977): Studies in the Resource Allocation Process. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlier, J. (1982): The one-machine sequencing problem. European Journal of Operations Research11, 42–47.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • de Korvin, A. Bourgeois, B. and Kleyle, R. (1994), Extracting fuzzy rules under uncertainty and measuring definablity using rough sets. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems2, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Korvin, A., Kleyle, R., Hashemi, S., and Quirchmayr, G. (1999), Assignment of tasks to competing nodes when task duration times are fuzzy. To appear in the Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, M., Verdegay, J. and Vila, M., (1994). Fuzzy Optimization: Recent Advances. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and Prade, H., (1980), Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. New York: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R. (1976), Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variables. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-6, 698–703.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Klir, G. and Yuan, B., (1995), Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Raggl, A., Slany, W.(1998), A reusable iterative optimization library to solve combinatorial problems with approximate reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 19(1–2) 161–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, M. (1991), Deterministic Lotsizing Models for Production Planning. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J. (1985), Optimal Decisions Under Uncertainty: Models, Methods and Management. New York, Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sivazlian, B., (1975), Optimization Techniques in Operations Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slany, W. (1996), Scheduling as a fuzzy multiple criteria optimization problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78, 197–222.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Verdegay, J, (1995), Fuzzy optimization: models, methods and perspectives. Sixth IFSA World Congress, July 22, 1995, vol. 1, 21–28,; Sao Paulo, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. 1988. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operations in multicriteria decision making. IEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18: 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L., (1978), Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 3–28.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Korvin, A., Hashemi, S., Quirchmayr, G., Kleyle, R. (2000). Assigning Tasks to Resource Pools: A Fuzzy Set Approach. In: Ibrahim, M., Küng, J., Revell, N. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1873. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67978-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44469-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics