Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Organizations and Collective Obligations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1873))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1812 Accesses

Abstract

Multi-Agent Systems are computational systems in which a collection of autonomous agents interact to achieve a certain task, for example to fulfil an obligation directed to the whole group, i.e., a collective obligation. Since, such a collective obligation is beyond the capacity of an individual agent, the agents have to communicate, cooperate, coordinate and negotiate with each other, to achieve the collective task: the fulfilment of the obligation. In this paper we discuss and formalise collective aspects of obligations and commitments. Collective obligations are analysed and formalised in a deontic logic framework. The notions of individual and collective commitment are defined to specify which individual has the responsibility to fulfill an ‘internal’ obligation as part of the collective obligation. In distributed artificial intelligence (DAI) theories of organisations, it is emphasized that ‘commitment’ is a crucial notion to analyse a collective activity or the structure of an organisation. In this paper we give a first attempt to formalise the notion of commitment to determine which plan has to be followed to achieve a joint goal, i.e. the fulfillment of a collective obligation by using several concepts as commitment, delegation and authority-relation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carmo, J. and O. Pacheco, Deontic and action logics for collective agency and roles, in: R. Demolombe and R. Hilpinen (eds)., Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, Toulouse, pp. 93–124, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castelfranchi, C, Commitments: Prom Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations, in: V. Lesser (editor), Proceedings First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, AAAI-Press and MIT Press, San Francisco, pp. 41–48, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C. and R. Falcone, Towards a theory of delegation for agent-based systems, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24, pp. 141–157, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conte, R., and C. Castelfranchi, Cognitive and Social Action, UCL Press, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunin-Keplicz, B., and R. Verbrugge, Collective Commitments, in: M. Tokora (editor), Proceedings Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, California, AAAI-Press, pp. 56–63, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gasser, L., Social conceptions of knowledge and action: DAI foundations and open systems semantics, Artificial Intelligence 47, pp. 107–138, 1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert, M., On Social Facts, Princeton, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert, M., Obligation and joint commitment, Utilitas 11, no. 2, pp., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hansson, B., Deontic Logic and Different Levels of Generality, Theoria 36, pp. 241–248, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrestad, H. and C. Krogh, Deontic Logic Relativised to Bearers and Counterparties, in: J. Bing and O. Torvund (editors), Anniversary Anthology in Computer and Law, COMPLEX-TANO, pp. 453–522, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilpinen, R., On the Semantics of Personal Directives, Ajatus 35, pp. 140–157, 1973.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kordig, C.R., Relativised Deontic Modalities, in: A.R. Anderson et al (editors), The Logical Enterprise, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 221–257, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levesque, J.H., P.R. Cohen and J.H. Nunes, On acting tgether, in: Proceedings of AAAI-90, Menlo Park, California, American Association for Artificial Intelligence Inc, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pörn, I., The Logic of Power, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A., and M. Georgeff, Modelling rational agents within a BDI-architecture, in: R. Fikes and E. Sandewall (editors), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufman, pp. 473–484, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rescher, N., The Logic of Commands, Dover, New York, 1966.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Royakkers, L.M.M., Extending deontic logic for the formalisation of legal rules, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Royakkers, L.M.M. and F. Dignum, From collective to individual obligations, in: Proceedings of The Law in the Information Society, Florence, Instituto per la documentazione giuridica del CNR, pp. 1008–1022, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Santos, F., A.J.I. Jones and J. Carmo, Responsibility for action in organizations: a formal model, in: G. Hölstrom-Hintikka and R. Tuomela (eds)., Contemporary Action Theory, Vol II (Social Action), Synthese Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 333–350, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Singh, M.P., Multiagent Systems: A theoretical Framework for intentions, know-how, and communication, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 799, Berlin, Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vogel Carey, T., How to confuse commitment with obligation, The Journal of Philosophy, pp. 276–284, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Technology Management and Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O.box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Lambèr Royakkers & Frank Dignum

Authors
  1. Lambèr Royakkers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank Dignum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Maritime Greenwich University Campus, 30 Park Row, London, SE10 9LS, UK

    Mohamed Ibrahim

  2. University of Linz, FAW, Altenbergerstr. 69, 4040, Linz, Austria

    Josef Küng

  3. Middlesex University, Bounds Green, London, UK

    Norman Revell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Royakkers, L., Dignum, F. (2000). Organizations and Collective Obligations. In: Ibrahim, M., Küng, J., Revell, N. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1873. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67978-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44469-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics