Abstract
Discovering interschema semantic knowledge between corresponding elements in a cooperating Multi-Information Server (MIS) environment requires deep knowledge, not only about the structure of the data represented in each server, but also about the commonly occurring differences in the intended semantics of this data. The same information could be represented in various incompatible structures, and more importantly the same structure could be used to represent data with many diverse and incompatible semantics. Interschema semantic knowledge can only be detected if both the structural and semantic properties of the schemas of these servers are made explicit and formally represented in a way that a computer system can process. Unfortunately, very often there is lack of such knowledge and the local schemas, being semantically weak as a consequence of the limited expressiveness of traditional data models, do not help the acquisition of this knowledge. The solution to overcome this limitation is primarily to upgrade the semantic level of the IS local schemas through a semantic enrichment process by augmenting these local schemas to semantically enriched schema models, then to use the enriched schema models in detecting and representing correspondences between classes belonging to different schemas. In this paper we investigate the possibility of using domain ontologies both for building semantically rich schema models, and for expressing interschema knowledge and reasoning about it. We believe that the use of domain ontologies in this setting has two important advantages. On the one hand, it enables a semantic approach for interschema knowledge specification, by concentrating on expressing conceptual and semantic correspondences between both the conceptual (intensional) definition and the set of instances (extension) of classes represented in different schemas. On the other hand, it is exactly this semantic nature of our approach that allows us to devise reasoning mechanisms for discovering and reusing interschema knowledge when the need arises to compare and combine it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. Ahmed, P. De Smedt, W. Du, W. Kent, M. A. Ketabchi, W. Litwin, and A. Rafi. The Pegasus heterogeneous multidatabase system. IEEE Computer, 24(12):19–27, 1991.
Y. Arens, C. Y. Chee, C. Hsu, and C. A. Knoblock. Retrieving and integrating data from multiple information sources. International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 2(2):127–158, 1993.
C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S. B. Navathe. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4):323–364, November 1986.
E. Bertino. Integration of heterogeneous data repositories by using object-oriented views. Proceedings of International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, Kyoto, Japan, pages 22–29, 1991.
P. Buneman, L. Raschid, and J. Ullman. Mediator languages-a proposal for a standard. Report of an I3/POB Working Group held at the University of Maryland, ftp://ftp.umiacs.umd.edu/pub/ONRrept/medmodel96.ps, April 1996.
T. Catarci and M. Lenzerini. Representing and using interschema knowledge in cooperative information systems. International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 2(4):375–398, 1993.
R.G. Cattel and Morgan Kufmann. ODMG-93 The Object Database Standard Release 1.2. Inc., San Francisco, California, 1996.
C. Collet, M. N. Huhus, and W. M. Shen. Resource integration using a large knowledge base in Carnot. IEEE Computer, 24(12):55–62, 1991.
C. H. Goh, S. Bressan, S. Mandick, and M. Siegel. Context interchange: New features and formalisms for the intelligent integration of information. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17(3):270–293, July 1999.
D. D. Karunaratna, W. A. Gray, and N. J. Fiddian. Establishing a knowledge base to assist integration of heterogeneous databases. In Suzanne M. Embury et al, editor, Proceedings of 16th British National Conference on Databases (BNCOD16), LNCS 1405, Springer, pages 103–118, 1998.
M. Kifer and G. Lauson. F-logic: A higher-order language for reasoning about objects, inheritance and scheme. Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference, 1995.
R. Krishnamurthy, W. Litwin, and W. Kent. Language features for interoperability of databases with schematic discrepancies. Proceedings of ACM SIGMOD Conference, 1991.
E. Kuhn and T. Ludwig. VIP-MDBMS: A logic multidatabase system. Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Distributed Databases, 1988.
J. Larson, S. Navathe, and R. Elmasri. A theory of attribute equivalence in databases with application to schema integration. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 15(4):449–463, 1989.
Alon Y. Levy, D. Srivastava, and T. Kirk. Data model and query evaluation in global information systems. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 5(2), 1995.
E. Mena, V. Kashyap, A. Sheth, and A. Illarramendi. Observer: An approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across pre-existing ontologies. Proceedings of First IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS’96), Brussels (Belgium), IEEE Computer Society Press, pages 14–25, June 1996.
A. Motro. Superviews: Virtual integration of multiple databases. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(7):785–798, 1987.
A. M. Ouksel and I. Ahmed. Ontologies are not the panacea in data integration: A flexible coordinator to mediate context construction. Distributed and Parallel Databases, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 7(1):7–35, 1999.
A. Rector, W. Solomon, W. Nowlan, and T. Rush. A terminology server for medical language and medical information systems. Methods of Information in Medicine, 34:147–157, 1995.
M. Siegel and S. Madnick. A metadata approach to resolving semantic conflicts. Proceedings of 17th VLDB Conference, 1991.
A-R Tawil and Wernher Behrendt. Requirements for components of an intelligent information retrieval model for the www. Intelligent World Wide Web Agents. IEE Colloquium organised by Professional Group c4 (Artificial Intelligence), 97(118):1-1–1-7, March 1997.
A-R Tawil, W. A. Gray, and N. J. Fiddian. Ontological commitments for multiple view cooperation in a distributed heterogeneous environment. Proceedings of 16th British National Conference on Databases (BNCOD16), 1998.
A-R Tawil, W. A. Gray, and N. J. Fiddian. Rich semantic-based schema integration in a federated MDBS environment. Submitted for publication to IDEAS, 2000.
William A. Woods and James G. Schmolze. The KL-ONE family. Computer Math. Applic., 23(2–5):133–177, August 1992.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tawil, AR.H., Gray, W.A., Fiddian, N.J. (2000). Discovering and Representing InterSchema Semantic Knowledge in a Cooperative Multi-Information Server Environment. In: Ibrahim, M., Küng, J., Revell, N. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1873. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_51
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67978-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44469-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive