Skip to main content

A Description Logics-Like Model for a Knowledge and Data Management System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1873))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays data management systems and knowledge management systems tend to converge. Our work is part of the OSIRIS data and knowledge management system. This system is centered on views which are said object-preserving (i.e. they do not create new objects). Our work led to the construction of a model for the OSIRIS System inspired from those of Description Logics. In this model we have defined the main functionalities of databases (insert, delete, modify, select) and description logics (subsumption). In this manner we show that there is a close relationship between subsumption calculus and query evaluation with the notion of interpretation. The data stored in a database can be seen as an interpretation (same meaning as in first order logic) of the set of axioms constituted by the databases’ scheme. Typically a database manipulates what is true in a single interpretation, a knowledge base what is true in all possible interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Abiteboul, P. Kanellakis, Object identity as a query language primitive, SIGMOD Record (ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data), n∘ 18(2), pp. 159–173, Juin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bulletin de l’AFIA n∘ 34, juillet 1998, Dossier Ingénierie des Connaissances, pp 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alsys, Manuel de référence du langage de programmation Ada, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ANSI/X3/SPARC Study group on database management systems. Interim report, ACM SiGMOD Bulletin 7, N2, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beneventano, Bergamaschi, Lodi, Sartori, Using subsumption in semantic query optimisation, IJCAI Workshop on object based representation systems, Août 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bert, R. Echahed, P. Jacquet, ML. Potet et JC. Reynaud, Spécification, Généricité, Prototypage: Aspects du langage LPG, Journal of Technique et Science Informatiques 9 vol 14. pp 1097–1129. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Bertino, A View Mechanism for Object-Oriented Databases, Advances in DB-Technology, Proc. Intl. Conf. on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Number 580, pp. 136–151, Springer, March 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Bertino and G. Guerrini, Objects with Multiple Most Specific Classes, ECOOP’95-Object-Oriented Programming, 9th European Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 952, pp. 102–126, Springer, 7–11 August 1995.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Buchheit, M. Jeusfeld, M. Staud, W. Nutt, Subsumption between Queries to Object-Oriented Databases, EDBT, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buchheit, Domini, Nutt, Schaerf, A refined architecture for terminological systems: terminology = schema + views, Artificial Intelligence, Vol 99, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. CLASSIC Description and Reference Manual For the COMMON LISP Implementation Version 2.2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Coupaye, Un modèle d’exécution paramétrique pour systèmes de bases de données, Thèse, LSR-IMAG Université Joseph Fourier, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Domini, Lenzerini, Nardi, Schaerf, Reasoning in description logics, Principles of Knowledge Representation, pp. 191–236, CSLI Publications, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Doyle, R. Patil, Two theses of knowledge representation: language restrictions, taxonomic classification, and the utility of representation srvices, in Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol 48, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Euzenat, COURSE de sémantique des modèles de connaissances, DEA d’informatique, Grenoble, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Hollunder, Werner Nutt, Subsumption algorithms for concept languages, Research Report, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Kïinstliche Intelligenz, Number RR-90-04.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Kim (ed), Modern Database Systems. The Object Model Interoperability and Beyond, ACM Press, Addison Wesey Publishing Company, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Lacroix and C. Delobel and P. Breche, Object Views and Database Restructuring, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1369, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Napoli, Une introduction aux logiques de description, Technical Report, Inria, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Number RR-3314.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Nebel, Reasoning and Revision in hybrid representation systems, LNAI, n∘ 422, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Sales-Simonet, Types abstraits et bases de données, Thèse, Université scientifique et médicale de Grenoble, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scholl, Laasch, Tresch, Updatable Views in Object-Oriented Databases, Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases (DOOD), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, n∘ 566, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Simonet, M. Simonet, Objects with Views and Constraints: from Databases to Knowledge Bases, Object-Oriented Information Systems OOIS’94-London, Springer Verlag, pp 182–197, Dec. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Simonet, Les P-TYPES: un modèle pour la définition de bases de connaissances centrées-objets cohérentes, R.R. 751-I laboratoire Artemis, Grenoble, Novembre 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Simonet, M. Simonet, C. G. Bassolet, X. Delannoy, R. Hamadi, Static Classification Schemes for an Object System, In: FLAIRS-98, 1 1th Int. FLorida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, AAAI Press, pp 254–258, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Souza dos Santos, Abiteboul, Delobel, Virtual schemas and bases, LNCS 779, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Roger, Requêtes dans un SGBD-BC de type objet avec vues, Rapport de Dea, UFR IMA, Grenoble, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Roncancio, Règies actives et règies déductives dans les bases de données à objets, Thèse, Université Joseph Fourier, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roger, M., Simonet, A., Simonet, M. (2000). A Description Logics-Like Model for a Knowledge and Data Management System. In: Ibrahim, M., Küng, J., Revell, N. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1873. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44469-6_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67978-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44469-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics