Skip to main content

Task Models, Intentions, and Agent Conversation Policies

  • Conference paper
PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1886))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is possible to define conversation policies, such as communication or dialogue protocols, that are based strictly on what messages and, respectively, what performatives may follow each other. While such an approach has many practical applications, such protocols support only “local coherence” in a conversation. Lengthy message exchanges require some infrastructure to lend them “global coherence.” Recognition of agent intentions about the joint task is essential for this global coherence, but there are further mechanisms needed to ensure that both local and global coherence are jointly maintained. This paper presents a general yet practical approach to designing, managing, and engineering agents that can do simple run-time intention recognition without creating complex multi-state protocols. In this approach we promote developing abstract task models and designing conversation policies in terms of such models. An implemented agent assistant based on these ideas is briefly described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bylander, T., Chandrasekaren, B.: Generic tasks for knowledge-based reasoning: The “right” level of abstraction for knowledge engineering, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 26 (1987) 231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, P. R., Levesque, H. J.: Communicative actions for artificial agents. In J. M. Bradshaw (ed.), Software Agents, AAAI Press, Menlo Park CA, (1997) 419–436

    Google Scholar 

  3. Greaves, M., Holmback, H., Bradshaw, J. What is a conversation policy? In M. Greaves & J. Bradshaw (eds). Specifying and implementing conversation policies. Autonomous Agents’ 99 Workshop (Seattle WA, May 1999), 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greaves, M, Bradshaw, J. (eds.): Specifying and Implementing Conversation Policies, Autonomous Agents’ 99 Workshop, (Seattle, WA, May 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. FIPA-99 specifications, see http://www.fipa.org/spec

  6. Haddadi, A.: Communication and cooperation in agent systems: A pragmatic theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol.1056 Springer-Verlag, Berlin New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Labrou, Y., Finin, T.: Semantics and conversations for an agent communication language. In Huhn, M. N., Singh, M. P. (eds.): Readings in Agents. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, (1998) 235–242

    Google Scholar 

  8. Laird, J.E., Newell, A., and Rosenbloom, P.S. SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 33 (1987) 1–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, S.: On conversation policies and the need for exceptions. In M. Greaves and J. Bradshaw (eds). Specifying and implementing conversation policies. Autonomous Agents’ 99 Workshop (Seattle WA, May 1999), 19–29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myers, K.: A procedural approach to task-level control knowledge, Proc. Third Int. Conf. on AI Planning Systems, AAAI Press, Menlo Park CA, (1996), 166–173

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pitt, J., Mamdani, A.: Communication protocols in multi-agent systems. In M. Greaves and J. Bradshaw (eds): Specifying and implementing conversation policies. Autonomous Agents’ 99 Workshop (Seattle WA, May 1999), 39–48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI agents: From theory to practice. Tech. Rep. 56, Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Melbourne, Australia, (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, I. A., Cohen, P.R., Bradshaw, J. M., Greaves, M., Holmback, H: Designing conversation policies using joint intention theory. In Proc. Third Int. Conf. on Multi-agent Systems, (Paris, France 1998) IEEE Press, 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sidner, C. L.: An artificial discourse language for collaborative negotiation, Proc. of 12th. Int. Conf. on Art. Intell (AAAI), AAAI Press, Menlo Park CA, (1994) 814–819.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elio, R., Haddadi, A., Singh, A. (2000). Task Models, Intentions, and Agent Conversation Policies. In: Mizoguchi, R., Slaney, J. (eds) PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1886. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67925-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44533-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics