Skip to main content

Hybrid Genetic Algorithms Are Better for Spatial Clustering

  • Conference paper
PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1886))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Iterative methods and genetic algorithms have been used separately to minimize the loss function of representative-based clustering formulations. Neither of them alone seems to be significantly better. Moreover, the trade-off of effort versus quality slightly favors gradient descent. We present a unifying view for the three most popular loss functions: least sum of squares, its fuzzy version and the log likelihood function. We identify commonalities in gradient descent algorithms for the three loss functions and the evaluation of the loss function itself. We can then construct hybrids (genetic algorithms with a mutation operation that performs few gradient descent steps) for all three clustering approaches. We demonstrate that these hybrids are much efficient and effective (significantly render better performance as normalized by the number of function evaluations or CPU time).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.S. Aldenderfer and R.K. Blashfield. Cluster Analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C.K. Chak and Feng G. Accelerated genetic algorithms: combined with local search for fast and accurate global search. In 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. Evolutionary Computation, 378–383, NY, 1995. IEEE Neural Network Council.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Cherkassky and F. Muller. Learning from Data — Concept, Theory and Methods. Wiley, NY, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Estivill-Castro and A.T. Murray. Clustering and capacitated facility location via hybrid optimisation. Proc. Int. ICSC Symp. on Intelligent Systems and Applications ISA-WOO, Wollongong, Australia, Dec. 12–15 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V Estivill-Castro and R. Torres-Velázquez. Hybrid genetic algorithm for solving the p-median problem. A Yao, et al eds., Proc. SEAL-98, 18–25. Springer Verlag LNAI 1585, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I.B. Hall, L.O. Özyurt and J.C. Bezdek. Clustering with a genetically optimized approach. IEEE T. Evolutionary Computation, 3(2): 103–112, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C.L. Huntley and Brown D.E. Parallel genetic algorithms with local search. Computer Ops Res, 26(6):559–571, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Koperski, J. Han, and J. Adhikari. Mining knowledge in geographical data. Communications of the ACM. to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.C. Kwong, S. abd Ng and K.F. Man. Improving local search in genetic algorithms for numerical global optimization using modified grid-point search technique. In Proc. GALESIA, 419–423, London, UK, 1995. IEE.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.J. Oliver, R.A. Baxter, and C.S. Wallace. Unsupervised learning using MML. Proc. 13th Machine Learning Conf., 364–372, 1996. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Ono and S. Kobayashi. A real coded genetic algorithm for function optimization using unimodal normal distributed crossover. T. Back, ed., Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, 246–253, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Reeves. Hybrid genetic algorithms for bin-packing and related problems. Annals of Operations Research, 63:371–396, May 1996.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. P.J. Rousseeuw and A.M. Leroy. Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, NY, 1987.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. M.A. Tanner. Tools for Statistical Inference. Springer-Verlag, NY, US., 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. N.L.J. Ulder, E.H.L. Aarts, H.-J. Bandelt, P.J.M. van Laarhoven, and E. Pesch. Genetic local search algorithms for the travelling salesman problem. H.-P. Schwefel et al, eds. Proc. 1st Workshop on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 109–116, Berlin, Germany, 1991. IEEE, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Estivill-Castro, V. (2000). Hybrid Genetic Algorithms Are Better for Spatial Clustering. In: Mizoguchi, R., Slaney, J. (eds) PRICAI 2000 Topics in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1886. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67925-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44533-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics