Abstract
The role of context is investigated in natural-language communication by differentiating between cognitive, linguistic and social contexts. It is firmly anchored to a dialogue framework and based on a relational conception of context as structured and interactionally organised. It adopts bottom-up and top-down perspectives and argues for natural-language communication as a dialogical, cooperative and collaborative endeavour, in which local meaning is negotiated in context. In the case of an acceptance, an utterance and its presuppositions are allocated to the dialogue common ground and assigned the status of co-suppositions. In the case of a non-acceptance, a negotiation-of-validity sequence is initiated. The adaptation of both micro and macro perspectives requires a differentiation between unilateral speech acts and collective dialogue acts, individual I-intentions and collective WE-intentions, individual presuppositions and collective co-suppositions, and individual sense-making and collective coherence.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bar-Hillel, Y.: Indexical expressions. In: Kasher, A. (ed.): Pragmatics: critical concepts. Routledge, London (1998) 23–40
Clark, H.H.: Using language. CUP, Cambridge (1996)
Ducrot, O.: Dire et ne par dire. Hermann, Paris (1972)
Fetzer, A.: Non-acceptances: re-or un-creating context. In P. Bouquet, P. Brezillon, L. Serafini (eds.): 2nd international and interdisciplinary conference on modeling and using context (Context’99). Springer, Heidelberg (1999) 133–144
Fetzer, A.: Negotiating validity claims in political interviews. Text 20(4) (2000) 1–46
Garfinkel, H.: Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge (1994)
Goffman, E.:. Frame analysis. North Eastern University Press, Boston (1974)
Linell, P.: Approaching dialogue. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1998)
Recanati, F.: The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language 4/4 (1989) 295–329
Searle, J.: Speech Acts. CUP, Cambridge (1969)
Searle, J.: Conversation. In J. Searle et al. (eds.): (On) Searle on conversation. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1992) 137–147
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.: Relevance. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fetzer, A. (2001). Context in Natural-Language Communication: Presupposed or Co-supposed?. In: Akman, V., Bouquet, P., Thomason, R., Young, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42379-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44607-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive