Skip to main content

Context in Natural-Language Communication: Presupposed or Co-supposed?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2116))

  • 652 Accesses

Abstract

The role of context is investigated in natural-language communication by differentiating between cognitive, linguistic and social contexts. It is firmly anchored to a dialogue framework and based on a relational conception of context as structured and interactionally organised. It adopts bottom-up and top-down perspectives and argues for natural-language communication as a dialogical, cooperative and collaborative endeavour, in which local meaning is negotiated in context. In the case of an acceptance, an utterance and its presuppositions are allocated to the dialogue common ground and assigned the status of co-suppositions. In the case of a non-acceptance, a negotiation-of-validity sequence is initiated. The adaptation of both micro and macro perspectives requires a differentiation between unilateral speech acts and collective dialogue acts, individual I-intentions and collective WE-intentions, individual presuppositions and collective co-suppositions, and individual sense-making and collective coherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bar-Hillel, Y.: Indexical expressions. In: Kasher, A. (ed.): Pragmatics: critical concepts. Routledge, London (1998) 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, H.H.: Using language. CUP, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ducrot, O.: Dire et ne par dire. Hermann, Paris (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fetzer, A.: Non-acceptances: re-or un-creating context. In P. Bouquet, P. Brezillon, L. Serafini (eds.): 2nd international and interdisciplinary conference on modeling and using context (Context’99). Springer, Heidelberg (1999) 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fetzer, A.: Negotiating validity claims in political interviews. Text 20(4) (2000) 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garfinkel, H.: Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goffman, E.:. Frame analysis. North Eastern University Press, Boston (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Linell, P.: Approaching dialogue. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Recanati, F.: The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language 4/4 (1989) 295–329

    Google Scholar 

  10. Searle, J.: Speech Acts. CUP, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Searle, J.: Conversation. In J. Searle et al. (eds.): (On) Searle on conversation. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1992) 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.: Relevance. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fetzer, A. (2001). Context in Natural-Language Communication: Presupposed or Co-supposed?. In: Akman, V., Bouquet, P., Thomason, R., Young, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44607-9_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42379-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44607-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics