Skip to main content

Outstanding Issues in Anaphora Resolution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2004))

Abstract

This paper argues that even though there has been considerable ad- vance in the research in anaphora resolution over the last 10 years, there are still a number of outstanding issues. The paper discusses several of these issues and outlines some of the work underway to address them with particular reference to the work carried out by the author’s research team.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alshawi, H.: Resolving quasi logical forms. Computational Linguistics, 16:3 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aone, C., McKee, D.: A language-independent anaphora resolution system for understanding multilingual texts. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the ACL (ACL’93), (1993) 156–163

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aone, C., Bennett, S.: Evaluating automated and manual acquisition of anaphora resolution rules. In: Proceedings of ACL’95, (1995) 122–129

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azzam, S., Humphreys, K., Gaizauskas, R.: Coreference resolution in a multilingual information extraction. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Coreference. Granada, Spain (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bagga, A.: Evaluation of coreferences and coreference resolution systems. In: Proceedings of the Second Colloquium on Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution (DAARC2), Lancaster, UK (1998) 28–33

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baldwin, B.: CogNIAC: high precision coreference with limited knowledge and linguistic resources. In: Proceedings of the ACL’97/EACL’97 workshop on Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution Madrid, Spain (1997) 38–45

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barbu, C., Mitkov. R.: Evaluation environment for anaphora resolution. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Translation and Multilingual Applications (MT2000), Exeter, UK. (2000) 18.1–18.8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Byron, D.: A proposal for consistent evaluation of pronoun resolution algorithms. (2001) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carbonell, J., Brown R.: Anaphora Resolution: a Multi-Strategy Approach. In: Proceedings of the 12. International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’88), Vol.I, Budapest, Hungary (1988) 96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardie, C., Wagstaff, K: Noun phrase coreference as clustering. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Joint SIGDAT conference on Empirical Methods in NLP and Very Large Corpora (ACL’99) University of Maryland, USA. (1999) 82–

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carter, D.: Interpreting Anaphora in Natural Language Texts. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carter, D.: Control issues in anaphor resolution. In: Journal of Semantics, 7, (1990) 435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins, M.: Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL (ACL’97) Madrid, Spain (1997) 16–

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daelemans, W., Zavarel, J., van der Slot, K., van den Bosch, A.: Timbl: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 2.0. Reference guide, ILK technical report ILK, Tilburg University (1999) 99–01

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dagan, I. and Itai, A.: Automatic processing of large corpora for the resolution of anaphora references. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’90), Vol. III, 1–3, Helsinki, Finland (1990) 1-3

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dagan, I., Itai, A.: A statistical filter for resolving pronoun references. In: Y.A. Feldman, Y.A, Bruckstein, A (eds): Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland) (1991) 125–135

    Google Scholar 

  17. Denber, M.: Automatic resolution of anaphora in English. Internal Report. Eastman Kodak Co. (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans, R.: A Comparison of Rule-Based and Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Non-nominal It. In: Natural Language Processing-NLP2000, Second International Conference Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, (2000) 233–242

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evans, R.: Applying machine learning toward an automatic classification of it. In: Literary and Linguistic Computing (2001) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Evans, R, Orasan, C.: Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts. In: Proceedings of the Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC2000). Lancaster, UK. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrandez, A., Palomar. M., Moreno L.: Slot unification grammar and anaphora resolution. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Proceeding (RANLP.97) Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria (1997) 294–299

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fukumoto, F., Yamada, H, Mitkov, R.: Resolving overt pronouns in Japanese using hierarchical VP structures. In: Proceedings of Corpora and NLP Monastir, Tunisia. (2000) 152–1

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ge, N., Hale, J., Charniak, E.: A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Very Large Corpora. Montreal. Canada. (1998) 161–170

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gelbukh, A., Sidorov G.: On Indirect Anaphora Resolution. In: Proceedings of PACLING-99, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, (1999) 181–1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grishman, R.: Information extraction. In: Mitkov R., Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics, Oxford University Press (2001) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harabagiu, S., Maiorano, S. J: Multilingual Coreference Resolution. In: Proceedings of ANLP-NAACL2000 (2000) 142–149

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hirschman, L.: MUC-7 coreference task definition. Version 3.0 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hobbs, J. R.: Pronoun resolution. Research Report 76-1. New York: Department of Computer Science, City University of New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hobbs, J. R.: Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44 (1978) 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kameyama, M.: Recognizing referential links: an information extraction perspective. In: Proceedings of the ACL’97/EACL’97 workshop on Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution Madrid, Spain (1997) 46–53

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kennedy, C. Boguraev, B.: Anaphora for everyone: pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’96)Copenhagen, Denmark (1996) 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lappin, S., Leass, H.: An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution, Computational Linguistics, 20(4), (1994) 535–561

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leech, G. and Garside, R.: Running a grammar factory: the production of syntactically analysed corpora or “treebanks”. In: Johannsson, S., Stenstrom, A. (eds.), English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide. Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin (1991) 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mitkov, R.: An uncertainty reasoning approach for anaphora resolution. In: Proceedings of the Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium (NLPRS’95), Seoul, Korea (1995) 149–1

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mitkov, R.: Pronoun resolution: the practical alternative. Paper presented at the Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC), Lancaster, UK (1996). Also appeared in: Botley, S., McEnery, T. (eds): Corpus-based and computational approaches to discourse anaphora. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (2000)189–212

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mitkov, R.: Factors in anaphora resolution: they are not the only things that matter. A case study based on two different approaches. In: Proceedings of the ACL’97/EACL’97 workshop on Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution, Madrid, Spain (1997) 14–

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mitkov, R.: Evaluating anaphora resolution approaches. In: Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC’2). Lancaster, UK (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mitkov, R.: Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’98)/ACL’98 Conference Montreal, Canada (1998) 869–875

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mitkov, R.: Towards more consistent and comprehensive evaluation in anaphora resolution. In: Proceedings of LREC’2000, Athens, Greece, (2000) 1309–1314

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mitkov, R.: Towards more consistent and comprehensive evaluation of robust anaphora resolution algorithms and systems. Invited talk. In: Proceedings of the Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC2000), (forthcoming). Lancaster, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mitkov, R.: Multilingual anaphora resolution. Machine Translation. (2000) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mitkov, R.: Anaphora resolution. Longman (2001) (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mitkov, R., Stys, M.: Robust reference resolution with limited knowledge: high precision genre-specific approach for English and Polish. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “Recent Advances in Natural Language Proceeding” (RANLP’97) Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria (1997) 74–

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mitkov, R., Barbu, C.: Improving pronoun resolution in two languages by means of bilingual corpora. In : Proceedings of the Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC 2000), Lanscaster, UK. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mitkov, R., Belguith, L., Stys, M.: Multilingual robust anaphora resolution. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-3). Granada, Spain (1998) 7–16

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mitkov, R., Orasan, C., and Evans, R.: The importance of annotated corpora for NLP: the cases of anaphora resolution and clause splitting. In: Proceedings of “Corpora and NLP: Reflecting on Methodology Workshop”. TALN’99, Corsica, France (1999) 60–

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mitkov, R., Evans, R., Orasan, C., Barbu, C., L. Jones, L., Sotirova, V.: Coreference and anaphora: developing annotating tools, annotated resources and annotation strategies. In: Proceedings of the Discourse, Anaphora and Reference Resolution Conference (DAARC2000). Lancaster, UK. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Munoz, R., Palomar, M.: Processing of Spanish definite description with the same head. In: Proceedings of NLP’2000, Patras, Greece (2000) 212–220

    Google Scholar 

  49. Munoz, R., Saiz-Noeda, M., Suárez, A., Palomar, M.: Semantic approach to bridging reference resolution. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Machine Translation and Multilingual Applications (MT2000) Exeter, UK. (2000) 17-1-17

    Google Scholar 

  50. Murata, M., Nagao, M.: Indirect reference in Japanese sentences. In: Botley, S., McEnery, T. (eds): Corpus-based and computational approaches to discourse anaphora. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (2000) 211–226

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nasukawa, T.: Robust method of pronoun resolution using full-text information. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’94) Kyoto, Japan (1994) 1157–11

    Google Scholar 

  52. Orasan, C.: ClinkA - a coreferential links annotator. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Languages Resources and Evaluation (LRE’2000), Athens, Greece (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Orasan C., Evans R., and Mitkov R.: Enhancing Preference-Based Anaphora Resolution with Genetic Algorithms, In Proceedings of NLP’2000, Patras, Greece (2000) 185–

    Google Scholar 

  54. Paice, C.D., Husk, G.D.: Towards the automatic recognition of anaphoric features in English text: the impersonal pronoun ‘it’” In: Computer Speech and Language, 2, (1987) 109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Poesio, M., Vieira, R., Teufel, S.: Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text. In: Proceedings of the ACL’97/EACL’97 workshop on Operational factors in practical, robust anaphora resolution, Madrid, Spain (1997) 1–

    Google Scholar 

  56. Preuβ S., Schmitz, B., Hauenschild, C., Umbach, U.: Anaphora Resolution in Machine Translation. Studies in Machine Translation and Natural Language Processing. In: Ramm, W.(ed): (Vol. 6 “Text and content in Machine Translation: Aspects of discourse representation and discourse processing”): Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community (1994) 29–52

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rich, E., LuperFoy S.: An Architecture for Anaphora Resolution. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP-2), Austin, Texas, U.S.A. (1988) 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sidner, C.: Toward a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in English. Technical report No. AI-TR-537. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tanev, H., Mitkov, R.:LINGUA-a robust architecture for text processing and anaphora resolution in Bulgarian. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Translation and Multilingual Applications (MT2000), Exeter, UK. (2000) 20.1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tetreault, J. R.: Analysis of Syntax-Based Pronoun Resolution Methods. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Maryland, USA. (1999) 602–6

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tapanainen, P., T. Jarvinen, T.: A non-projective Dependency Parser. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference of Applied Natural Language Processing, ACL, USA. (1997) 64–

    Google Scholar 

  62. Vieira, R., Poesio, M.: Processing definite descriptions in corpora In: Botley, S., McEnery, T. (eds): Corpus-based and computational approaches to discourse anaphora. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia (2000a) 189–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Vieira, R., Poesio, M.: An empirically-based system for processing definite descriptions. In: Computational Linguistics (2000b) 26(4).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Walker, M., Joshi, A., Prince, E.: Centering in naturally occurring discourse: an overview. In: Walker, M., Joshi, A., Prince, E. (eds): Centering theory in discourse. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Williams, S., Harvey, M., Preston, K.: Rule-based reference resolution for unrestricted text using part-of-speech tagging and noun phrase parsing. In: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution (DAARC), Lancaster, UK. (1996) 441–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mitkov, R. (2001). Outstanding Issues in Anaphora Resolution. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2004. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44686-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44686-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41687-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44686-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics