Abstract
Using an automata-theoretic approach, we investigate the decidability of liveness properties (called Presburger liveness properties) for timed automata when Presburger formulas on configurations are allowed. While the general problem of checking a temporal logic such as TPTL augmented with Presburger clock constraints is undecidable, we show that there are various classes of Presburger liveness properties which are decidable for discrete timed automata. For instance, it is decid- able, given a discrete timed automaton A and a Presburger property P, whether there exists an ω-path of A where P holds infinitely often. We also show that other classes of Presburger liveness properties are indeed undecidable for discrete timed automata, e.g., whether P holds infinitely often for each ω-path of A. These results might give insights into the cor- responding problems for timed automata over dense domains, and help in the definition of a fragment of linear temporal logic, augmented with Presburger conditions on configurations, which is decidable for model checking timed automata.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Alur, “Timed automata”, CAV’99, LNCS 1633, pp. 8–22
R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, and D. Dill, “Model-checking in dense real time,” Information and Computation, 104 (1993) 2–34
R. Alur and D. Dill, “Automata for modeling real-time systems,” Theoretical Computer Science, 126 (1994) 183–236
R. Alur, T. Feder, and T. A. Henzinger, “The benefits of relaxing punctuality,” J. ACM, 43 (1996) 116–146
R. Alur, T. A. Henzinger, “Real-time logics: complexity and expressiveness,” Information and Computation, 104 (1993) 35–77
R. Alur, T. A. Henzinger, “A really temporal logic,” J. ACM, 41 (1994) 181–204
A. Coen-Porisini, C. Ghezzi and R. Kemmerer, “Specification of real-time systems using ASTRAL,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23 (1997) 572–598
H. Comon and V. Cortier, “Flatness is not a weakness,” Proc. Computer Science Logic, 2000.
H. Comon and Y. Jurski, “Timed automata and the theory of real numbers,” CONCUR’99, LNCS 1664, pp. 242–257
Z. Dang, O. H. Ibarra, T. Bultan, R. A. Kemmerer, and J. Su, “Binary reachability analysis of discrete pushdown timed automata,” CAV’00, LNCS 1855, pp. 69–84
T. A. Henzinger, Z. Manna, and A. Pnueli, “What good are digital clocks?,” ICALP’92, LNCS 623, pp. 545–558
T. A. Henzinger and Pei-Hsin Ho, “HyTech: the Cornell hybrid technology tool,” Hybrid Systems II, LNCS 999, pp. 265–294
T. A. Henzinger, X. Nicollin, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine, “Symbolic model checking for real-time systems,” Information and Computation, 111 (1994) 193–244
K. G. Larsen, P. Pattersson, and W. Yi, “UPPAAL in a nutshell,” International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1 (1997): 134–152
F. Laroussinie, K. G. Larsen, and C. Weise, “From timed automata to logic-and back,” MFCS’95, LNCS 969, pp. 529–539
F. Wang, “Parametric timing analysis for real-time systems,” Information and Computation, 130 (1996): 131–150
S. Yovine, “A verification tool for real-time systems,” International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1 (1997): 123–133
S. Yovine, “Model checking timed automata,” Embedded Systems’98, LNCS 1494, pp. 114–152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dang, Z., Pietro, P.S., Kemmerer, R.A. (2001). On Presburger Liveness of Discrete Timed Automata. In: Ferreira, A., Reichel, H. (eds) STACS 2001. STACS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41695-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44693-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive