Skip to main content

On Presburger Liveness of Discrete Timed Automata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 2001 (STACS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2010))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Using an automata-theoretic approach, we investigate the decidability of liveness properties (called Presburger liveness properties) for timed automata when Presburger formulas on configurations are allowed. While the general problem of checking a temporal logic such as TPTL augmented with Presburger clock constraints is undecidable, we show that there are various classes of Presburger liveness properties which are decidable for discrete timed automata. For instance, it is decid- able, given a discrete timed automaton A and a Presburger property P, whether there exists an ω-path of A where P holds infinitely often. We also show that other classes of Presburger liveness properties are indeed undecidable for discrete timed automata, e.g., whether P holds infinitely often for each ω-path of A. These results might give insights into the cor- responding problems for timed automata over dense domains, and help in the definition of a fragment of linear temporal logic, augmented with Presburger conditions on configurations, which is decidable for model checking timed automata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Alur, “Timed automata”, CAV’99, LNCS 1633, pp. 8–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, and D. Dill, “Model-checking in dense real time,” Information and Computation, 104 (1993) 2–34

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Alur and D. Dill, “Automata for modeling real-time systems,” Theoretical Computer Science, 126 (1994) 183–236

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Alur, T. Feder, and T. A. Henzinger, “The benefits of relaxing punctuality,” J. ACM, 43 (1996) 116–146

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Alur, T. A. Henzinger, “Real-time logics: complexity and expressiveness,” Information and Computation, 104 (1993) 35–77

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Alur, T. A. Henzinger, “A really temporal logic,” J. ACM, 41 (1994) 181–204

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Coen-Porisini, C. Ghezzi and R. Kemmerer, “Specification of real-time systems using ASTRAL,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23 (1997) 572–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Comon and V. Cortier, “Flatness is not a weakness,” Proc. Computer Science Logic, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Comon and Y. Jurski, “Timed automata and the theory of real numbers,” CONCUR’99, LNCS 1664, pp. 242–257

    Google Scholar 

  10. Z. Dang, O. H. Ibarra, T. Bultan, R. A. Kemmerer, and J. Su, “Binary reachability analysis of discrete pushdown timed automata,” CAV’00, LNCS 1855, pp. 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. A. Henzinger, Z. Manna, and A. Pnueli, “What good are digital clocks?,” ICALP’92, LNCS 623, pp. 545–558

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. A. Henzinger and Pei-Hsin Ho, “HyTech: the Cornell hybrid technology tool,” Hybrid Systems II, LNCS 999, pp. 265–294

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. A. Henzinger, X. Nicollin, J. Sifakis, and S. Yovine, “Symbolic model checking for real-time systems,” Information and Computation, 111 (1994) 193–244

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. K. G. Larsen, P. Pattersson, and W. Yi, “UPPAAL in a nutshell,” International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1 (1997): 134–152

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Laroussinie, K. G. Larsen, and C. Weise, “From timed automata to logic-and back,” MFCS’95, LNCS 969, pp. 529–539

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Wang, “Parametric timing analysis for real-time systems,” Information and Computation, 130 (1996): 131–150

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Yovine, “A verification tool for real-time systems,” International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1 (1997): 123–133

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Yovine, “Model checking timed automata,” Embedded Systems’98, LNCS 1494, pp. 114–152

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dang, Z., Pietro, P.S., Kemmerer, R.A. (2001). On Presburger Liveness of Discrete Timed Automata. In: Ferreira, A., Reichel, H. (eds) STACS 2001. STACS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41695-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44693-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics