Skip to main content

New Results on Alternating and Non-deterministic Two-Dimensional Finite-State Automata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 2001 (STACS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2010))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We resolve several long-standing open questions regarding the power of various types of finite-state automata to recognize “pic- ture languages,” i.e. sets of two-dimensional arrays of symbols. We show that the languages recognized by 4-way alternating finite-state automata (AFAs) are incomparable to the so-called tiling recognizable languages. Specifically, we show that the set of acyclic directed grid graphs with crossover is AFA-recognizable but not tiling recognizable, while its com- plement is tiling recognizable but not AFA-recognizable. Since we also show that the complement of an AFA-recognizable language is tiling rec- ognizable, it follows that the AFA-recognizable languages are not closed under complementation. In addition, we show that the set of languages recognized by 4-way NFAs is not closed under complementation, and that NFAs are more powerful than DFAs, even for languages over one symbol.

Research supported by NSF Grant CCR 97-33101.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Blum and C. Hewitt, “Automata on a 2-dimensional tape.” 8th IEEE Symp. on Switching and Automata Theory (1967) 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Giammarresi and A. Restivo, “Recognizable picture languages.” Int. J. of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 6(2-3) (1992) 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Giammaresi, “Two-dimensional languages and recognizable functions.” In G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, Eds., Proc. Developments in Language Theory. World Scientific (1994) 290–301.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Giammarresi and A. Restivo, “Two-dimensional languages.” In G. Rosen-berg and A. Salomaa, Eds., Handbook of Formal Languages, Volume III.Springer Verlag (1996) 215–267.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Inoue and A. Nakamura, “Some properties of two-dimensional on-line tessellation acceptors.” Information Sciences 13 (1977) 95–121.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Inoue and A. Nakamura, “Two-dimensional finite automata and unac-ceptable functions.” Int. J. Comput. Math. A 7 (1979) 207–213.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Inoue and I. Takanami, “A survey of two-dimensional automata theory.” Information Sciences 55 (1991) 99–121.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Lindgren, C. Moore and M.G. Nordahl, “Complexity of two-dimensional patterns.” Journal of Statistical Physics 91 (1998) 909–951.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. O. Matz, “Dot-depth, monadic quantifier alternation and first-Order closure over grids and pictures.” To appear in Theoretical Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.L. Milgram, “A region crossing problem for array-bounded automata.” Information and Control 31 (1976) 147–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Minsky, Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines. Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Rosenfeld, Picture Languages: Formal Models for Picture Recognition. Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Sipser, “Halting space-bounded computations.” Theoretical Computer Science 10 (1980) 335–338.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Szepietowski, “Two-dimensional on-line tesselation acceptors are not closed under complement.” Information Sciences, 64 (1992) 115–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kari, J., Moore, C. (2001). New Results on Alternating and Non-deterministic Two-Dimensional Finite-State Automata. In: Ferreira, A., Reichel, H. (eds) STACS 2001. STACS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44693-1_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41695-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44693-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics