Skip to main content

Representing Hierarchical Automata in Interactive Theorem Provers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2152))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Hierarchical Automata represent a structured model of statecharts. They are formalized in Isabelle/HOL. The formalization is on two levels. The first level is the set-based semantics; the second level exploits the tree-like structure of the hierarchical automata to represent them using Isabelle’s datatypes and primitive recursive functions. Thereby the proofs about hierarchical automata are simplified. In order to ensure soundness of this twofold approach we define a mapping from the latter to the former representation and prove that it preserves the defining properties of hierarchical automata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Burghardt, F. Kammüller, J. Sanders. On the Antisymmetry of Galois Embeddings. Information Processing Letters, 79:2, Elsevier, June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Abstract Interpretation. In Principles of Programming Languages, ACM Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edmund M. Clarke, Orna Grumberg, and Doron A. Peled. Model Checking. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nancy Day and Jeffrey Joyce. The Semantics of Statecharts in HOL. In International Meeting on Higher-Order Logic Theorem Proving and its Applications. Springer LNCS, 780:338–351, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Harel and D. Naamad. A STATEMATE semantics for statecharts. ACM Trans. on Software Engineering and Methodology, 5(4):293–333, Oct 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Kammüller and S. Helke. Mechanical Analysis of UML State Machines and Class Diagrams. In Defining Precise Semantics for UML, Sophia Antipolis, France, June 2000. Satellite Workshop, ECOOP 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Mikk. Semantics and Verification of Statecharts. PhD thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel. Bericht Nr. 2001, October 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Olaf Müller and Tobias Nipkow. Combining Model Checking and Deduction for I/O Automata. In TACAS’95, Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, Springer LNCS, 1019:1–16, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Nipkow and K. Slind. I/O Automata in Isabelle/HOL. In Types for Proofs and Programs, Springer LNCS, 996:101–119, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. C. Paulson. Isabelle: A Generic Theorem Prover, Springer LNCS, 828, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassen Saïdi and Natarajan Shankar. Abstract and Model Check While You Prove. In N. Halbwachs and D. Peled, editors, 11th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, CAV’99, Springer LNCS, 1633, 1999.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. M. von der Beeck. A Comparison of Statechart Variants/ In Formal Techniques in Real-Time and Fault-Tolerant Systems. Springer LNCS, 863: 128–148, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Helke, S., Kammüller, F. (2001). Representing Hierarchical Automata in Interactive Theorem Provers. In: Boulton, R.J., Jackson, P.B. (eds) Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics. TPHOLs 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2152. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44755-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44755-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42525-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44755-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics